InvestorsHub Logo

investor911

12/01/07 11:12 PM

#105785 RE: Howyadoing #105784

Get your comments straight, from the recent filings. July is past, we are in DEC and had many recent filings, with much of the updates. Hope you will find the details. GLTU and Good Night.

Soapy Bubbles

12/01/07 11:18 PM

#105786 RE: Howyadoing #105784

OK, Round 2:

Quote:

From the 10 KSB
On July 1, 2007, Seaway Capital, Inc. acquired GreenShift's entire controlling stake in GS Carbon Corporation in return for the assumption of $498,074 legacy debt and $1,117,719 Highgate debt.
http://yahoo.brand.edgar-online.com/fetchFilingFrameset.aspx?FilingID=5544986&Type=HTML

No matter how you try and slice it and dice it ,
it still comes out to where shareholders of SWVC were mislead!
Who would've thought ol Uncle Tom would come out months later to reveal that the biggest part of the conversions were going through at .001
The best brains on this board thought we should've neen done converting months ago! But here we set , still wondering just how many more to go!
$1,615,793 was the debt of the shell and there has been over 630 million shares converted already and sold to unsuspecting shareholders at an avg. price of .032 , that is over 20 million dollars of shareholders money to pay off a 1.6 million dollar debt!!
AND THEY ARE STILL NOT DONE CONVERTING SHARES
My estimate comes out to 1.2 billion by the time they are done and of course that doesn't include any other conversions of series C shares from Wisebuys or Hackets shareholders or other convertables that have been added recently from the last 8K

Comment:

That's an old filing. Good try. The current 10Q shows Highgate is complete and Cornell (including Cadent) was dumped onto GSCT. Nice try, deceitful commentary on your part and intellectually dishonest. That is not serious DD nor a solid commentary on the facts. The facts are in the recent 10Q.

Quote:
You can spin it any way you want !
KK is/was/will be involved in the future shell / debt games that he /cornell / his wife have been up to for many years!
Don't think for one minute that KK is just going to hand it all over to the lovely SWVC shareholders with out having them involved in his next round of toxic financing!
Oh, by the way, all of his "Patent Pending technology " has been pending for over 4 years , maybe longer as I've only followed that long.
Hey charts don't lie , just look them up !
GSCT - GSHF - GSGF - GSEG

Comment:

I didn't spin. That's just fact from the 10Q. Viridis finished and Candent was handed to Corn. In turn, Corn was dumped onto GS. Everything else you state is jusr belief and an uninformed opinion -- meaningless and of no value to a serious researcher.

Also, an ad hom attack on KK isn't DD -- it's nothing of value.

So what if the charts suck? (I agree -- they do.) But that's not DD. That's just TA.

Quote:

What I do know is that every other detail that Tom has held onto , for future release , has always been bad news to the market and when the info. was finally released the PPS has always dropped !
I don't look for that to change on the future ammendments to the Hackets deal either!
He's already added one in the latest 8K :

"WiseBuys also agreed to execute a guaranty in favour of Community Bank of approximately $1.9 million in debt owed by Hacketts to Community Bank"
http://yahoo.brand.edgar-online.com/fetchFilingFrameset.aspx?FilingID=5570916&Type=HTML

I can hardly wait to see all of the wonderful debts and conversions that will be announced in the ammended 8K filing.

Comment:

OK, explain why the community bank is a problem. If you can, I'll listen. I bet you can't.

Ummm. You're confusing PPS w/ the intrinsic values of holdings. Filling the shell has increased the overvalue of the company. The value of the company doesn't strictly depend upon the "Sell the News" mentality that beats the PPS down. If you seriously think PPS is a direct reflection of valuation, then you're in trouble. A company can be under/overvalued and that's a fact of the stock market. Why not be true for SWVC as well? S&P makes tons of comments on valuation -- and one is that the PPS is not a direct reflection of intrinsic value. If you need proof, go look at CICHF and explain why it's under a dollar.

Quote:

I've done plenty of research and have draw my conclusions !
And they are not based on pipe dreams and fairy tails like many on this board !

Comment:

I disagree. If you did, you'd be asking better questions grounded in facts and not old filings and biases.



Ace Magoo

12/02/07 5:02 AM

#105829 RE: Howyadoing #105784

I only regret that I have but only one member mark to give to you. I love smart people.

Enjoy :)