Replies to post #12022 on Universal Express Inc fka USXP

[janice shell]

As you yourself recently posted:

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission Regulation 17(b) states:

“It shall be unlawful for any person, by the use of any means or instruments of transportation or communication in interstate commerce or by the use of the mails, to publish, give publicity to, or circulate any notice, circular, advertisement, newspaper, article, letter, investment service, or communication which, though not purporting to offer a security for sale, describes such security for a consideration received or to be received, directly or indirectly, from an issuer, underwriter, or dealer, without fully disclosing the receipt, whether past or prospective, of such consideration and the amount thereof.”

So I think Bud's "privilege" could be disputed.

[puppydotcom]

Stockdung' that is total BS ... he was paid by usxp - he is on the list of creditors - His company was not paid by an outside law firm - his deal was with RA/Gunny/usxp (and both have been sued/charged for securities violations plus many other charges and found in contempt and are both under federal investigation
according to the lawsuit/SEC filings) He still should of disclosed his payment because of his involvement in usxp, the stock market and his pumping of RA and the NSS.
I wonder how many other companies did he some how fail to disclose his fees for pumping' because of secret "Claims of Privilege"?

His very late confession excuse of payment came only after the receiver took control of usxp ... his excuse for non discloser is the same as the weak BS excuse he is using to defend RA in the total raping of usxp shareholders' total BS

this is my opinion