InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

JJ123abc

11/07/07 12:15 PM

#16814 RE: stock_jock40 #16808

"potential and real naked shorts"

Wouldn't a little revenue and actual earnings take care of this? If the Co has earnings and positive cash flow, there will be demand for the shares, if the MM's have to artifically hold the price down for the shorts to cover, that just makes an opportunity for you and I to buy more.

If the co has the money to operate a 2,000,000 gal fuel plant, they would not need to go to the capital market and the share price would be a non-event to the operations of the co.

Assuming that we have no debt that is convertable, we have had all the dilution we are going to have.


icon url

Risicare

11/07/07 12:26 PM

#16817 RE: stock_jock40 #16808

The cellar boxing thing is a load of BS plain and simple.
icon url

doggone

11/08/07 10:29 AM

#16877 RE: stock_jock40 #16808

sj40, In the post "cellar Boxing" there is a phrase that appears to be a cause foer concern to me. Perhaps the board can comment on what it might mean. thanks
"Nevada domiciled companies usually cancel all of their shares in the system, both real and fake, and force shareholders and their b/ds to PROVE the ownership of the old “real” shares before they get a new “real” share. Many also file their civil suits at this time also. ".
The board may remember my inquiry as to what the exact meaning of this statement;
"What are being represented as shares being sold in our company are traded by Market Makers."
The two appear connected to me?
Does the first one mean, if this action ' companies usually cancel all of their shares in the system, both real and fake,' were to take place, would we loose our shares or would our broker simply be forced to produce them?