InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

binarymfg

11/06/07 4:00 PM

#5043 RE: thirstytwo #5041

I wonder if you ever think before you post or just start typing without a care for logic and reason.

You clearly have worked in a concerted effort to drive the stock down and you claim your reason for doing this is that your mommy's friends have invested in the stock.

Whoa, you must really hate your mother. What a way to make her proud.

My guess is that this is just another false story made up by you with the aid of the confidence that comes from ignorance coupled with being encumbered by integrity.
icon url

binarymfg

11/07/07 2:24 PM

#5067 RE: thirstytwo #5041

According to your post your mommy is a friend of Mrs. Abrams and they are going to go as a group and sue RSPG.

Is that the Trudy Abrams that is listed on the public web site of the LA Superior Court (see bottom of post for public web address) as having a default judgment filed against her by RSPG?

If it is and she has such a great case why did she not file a cross complaint or even answer the lawsuit?

Again I must ask, do you ever think before you make up your replies or do you simply let your unstable emotions speak for you?

LA Superior Court Web Site:

http://www.lasuperiorcourt.org/civilCaseSummary/Index.asp?CaseType=Civil

Go down towards the bottom center and enter in the "Case Number" box LC078855 (It is a zero after the LC).

That will take you to the information. This information is public knowledge and it represents important news for RSPG investors.

P.S. When you go to the web site you will see that RSPG has corrected the clerical error regarding the only defendant who does not have a default entered so most likely they will get their default filed properly against him now.