InvestorsHub Logo

TENNISSTUD

02/22/04 2:01 AM

#32180 RE: Mattu #32167

Matt......if you looked over HRCT's posting for the past 24 hours, you would need to throw in jail 50% of the posters based on your definition of how to post. That is the problem with your methods. Posters must shoot first and ask questions later, that is if they want to retain crediability there. Over time anyone can be inticed into attacking others. That is the atmosphere on that board. Whats worse is the norm on that particular board is attack or be attacked. At one time the same posters appeared on the AOL board and at a certain point AOL decided to close that board. So at any given moment one can be thrown in jail because we aren't posting positive. (And Tin-berry has done a great job as monitor ...... that poor guy gets slammed on a regular basis) so I'm not referring to him.
While spending time in jail I have had the opportunity to read many jailed inmates post. A common theme that arises is the inequities of how rules are applied. Inmates aren't saying they are innocent but instead they are saying "Hey why isn't so and so here with me? If I'm guilty then certainly he must be.
My point is why don't you visit that board......I'm sure you will find many offensive posters.
Two wrongs don't make a right so this is not being posted as an excuse to my post. I'm guilty as charged. It just seems strange that one poster can be singled out from the norm.
Whats up with that???

SPIN

02/22/04 6:38 PM

#32229 RE: Mattu #32167

yep, it is yer neighborhood.

fully realize as much & apologize for posting what you construed to be vulgar & inappropriate.

can't agree that it was "unrelated to wavx" as it was a satiric comment about wavoid zealots' reactions whenever their Lord-CEO speaks.

it was also a play on words in response to a poster who claimed i took a "beating" by predicting that Wave's PP registration would be severely delayed (it was) & of the probability Wave would have to pay liquidated damages to PPers (& they did).

but i s'pose in certain circles the masturbation metaphor could definitely be perceived as vulgar & inappropriate. i'll stay away from such double entendres in the future.

anyway, mea culpa.

contritely,

SPIN