Replies to post #12642 on DNAprint Genomics (DNAG)

[mingwan0]

terry, the subject matter concerned would be more appropriate for William Thompson to comment on IMO. He is also listed on the website devoted to the defence of the case. I can understand DNAP being contacted to review the case in the context of the potential use of DNA Witness, but I do not see why the defeence team would want such statements from somebody who has never given evidence in court. Thompson has and would have been a more "credible" source IMO.

Irrespective, as I have said before I would like to see DNA Witness used to exonerate those falsly imprisoned. It does not look as if that is going to be the case here.

[BBBabe]

Terry, I could not agree with you more about B.S...(btw, perfect initials for him). And also 'the temple of liars' remark. How on earth our courts ever came to become what they, now, are...the repository for con artists, dressed up like lawyers...more often than not ~ is beyond me.
And on some juries, any idiot can be swayed with such nonsense, very easily. I would never wish to see any innocent be unfairly imprisoned, but with dna, now....that is going to be more difficult to do in the future. btw, Is Gaskin talking to Denver police about Ramsey case? One recent post gave me that impression. Perhaps, I misunderstood their point. tia. Babe