Replies to post #36519 on SPOOZ Inc (SPZI)

[Mike Fletcher]

I see where Paul directly addressed the no reverse split but I don't believe he directly addressed potential dilution.

" a reverse split or continued dilution of the companies stock was out of the question."

Do you continue to maintain this position.

Answer : Yes, at this time, no reverse splits are planned or contemplated.

Possibly and hopefully it is nothing more than a little oversight or misinterpretraion of the question (on either my part or Paul's part), especially in light of the following filing on EDGAR:

SEC EDGAR Filing Information
Form REGDEX -- Notice of Sale of Securities [Regulation D and Section 4(6) of the Securities Act of 1933]
Filing Date Changed: 2007-11-01
Effectiveness Date: 2007-10-29
Documents: 1
SEC Accession No.
9999999997-07-046655
Filing date: 2007-10-29
Accepted: 2007-11-01 11:24:46

Not trying to cause any problems, just want as much information as possible available to everyone.

[paper]

Thanks ITGuy.

[EBI]

I have been giving this some thought. In the past, Paul has coined the term "creative financing." Are we looking at a situation were we could get Siamese Shares with 141? I know it's used for REITs but I don't know enough about the process to know if it's feasible in this case. Does anyone here know?

[jdre]

What concerns me is "Yes, at this time, no reverse splits are planned or contemplated."

AT THIS TIME is what I always say to people when I know its going to happen in the future but don't want to tell them right now.