InvestorsHub Logo

Tadaaa

10/26/07 6:40 PM

#81741 RE: lowtrade #81736

Additional DD...from the August 10q

On February 26, 2007, the Company entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement
(the "February 2007 CCP Agreement"), with Cornell Capital Partners, LP.
("Cornell"). In connection with the February 2007 CCP Agreement, Cornell
purchased secured convertible debentures amounting to $1,125,000 due on February
26, 2009.

The February 26, 2007 Cornell debentures provide for interest in the amount of
10% per annum and are convertible at the lesser of $0.05 or 90% of the lowest
closing bid price of the Company's common stock during the 30 trading days
immediately preceding the conversion date. Cornell will be entitled to convert
the February 26, 2007 debenture on the basis of the conversion price into the
Company's common stock, provided that Cornell cannot convert into shares that
would cause Cornell to own more 4.9% of the Company's outstanding common stock.

The Company at its option shall have the right, with three (3) business days
advance written notice (the "Redemption Notice"), to redeem a portion or all
amounts outstanding under the 10% Secured Debenture prior to the Maturity Date
provided that the Closing Bid Price of the Company's common stock, as reported
by Bloomberg, LP, is less than the Fixed Conversion Price at the time of the
Redemption Notice. The Company shall pay an amount equal to the principal amount
being redeemed plus a redemption premium ("Redemption Premium") equal to twenty
percent (20%) of the principal amount being redeemed, and accrued interest,
(collectively referred to as the "Redemption Amount").

In connection with the February 2007 CCP Agreement, the Company paid Yorkville
Advisors, LLP a fee equal to $100,000 and a structuring fee of $25,000 from the
proceeds of the closing. Accordingly, the Company received net proceeds of
$1,000,000. These fees were treated as a deferred financing fees and beginning
on February 27, 2007 are being amortized over the term of the loan. The Company
used $900,000 of the proceeds from the Cornell Debenture to repay loans payable
to GreenShift Corporation and GS Ethanol Technologies.

In addition the Company issued to Cornell a warrant to purchase 50,000,000
shares of the Company's common stock at $0.03 a share. The value of the warrant
was calculated to be $712,125 at the time of the issuance using the guidance
found in APB Opinion 14, "Accounting for Convertible Debt and Debt issued with
Detachable Stock Purchase Warrants" and was recorded as a discount. The discount
is amortized to interest expense using the effective interest method of
amortization.

The Company determined that the conversion feature of the convertible debenture
represents an embedded derivative since the debenture is convertible into a
variable number of shares upon conversion. Accordingly, the convertible
debenture is not considered to be conventional debt under EITF 00-19 and the
embedded conversion feature must be bifurcated from the debt host and accounted
for as a derivative liability. The embedded derivative feature created by the
variable conversion meets the criteria of SFAS 133 and EITF 00-19, and should be
accounted for as a separate derivative.
At June 30, 2007 the fair value of the
conversion derivative liability created by this debenture calculated using the
Black-Scholes model was $3,266,171. For the three and six months periods ended
June 30, 2007 the unrealized loss on the derivative instrument created by this
debenture was $1,859,921and $3,266,171, respectively.

vortmaximum

10/26/07 6:45 PM

#81748 RE: lowtrade #81736

My 3rd boardmark to you!

lightbeam

10/26/07 6:51 PM

#81760 RE: lowtrade #81736

Thanks for your help Low!

GLTA172

10/26/07 6:53 PM

#81763 RE: lowtrade #81736

Lowtrade, I agree that even if the 8ka does not annul the statement 2.03 (b) of the 8k, this does not exclude that nevertheless Cornell is done and that your DD therefore could be right! If I do not make any basic mistake just now, the fact that the statement in 2.03 (b) has not been removed does not exclude the fact that Cornell is done... The 8ka does not say or suggest that it is done but it does not exclude it either. Please correct me, if I just tell nonsense... GLTA!

AMERICAN_PSYCHO

10/26/07 7:03 PM

#81769 RE: lowtrade #81736

"IMO The company share structure may be clean."

Awesome DD lowtrade! I'd give you another member mark if I could.

chunky-g

10/26/07 7:03 PM

#81770 RE: lowtrade #81736

So these big guy price run ups are created in concert with the MM's to help convert shares at a better price? ??

chunky-g

10/26/07 7:09 PM

#81796 RE: lowtrade #81736

Lowtrade, , , Incredible piece of work! Easy to you I'm sure but all makes perfect sense!! So we should have the start of the next big run up sometime next week hopefully to burn up the rest hopefully! But if everyone knows this, won't everyone dump prematurely knowing it's just another big guy run up? That's what probably happened on the last one when it didn't hit what you expected. Correct me if I'm wrong and I'd like to appologize again as I told you before I'd stop asking questions!! I'll member mark you when I figure out how, I've never tried! Thanks again, Chunky-g

Sprycel

10/26/07 10:31 PM

#82090 RE: lowtrade #81736

Thank you for your great confirmation!!! I worked the numbers alittle differently but I am glad you verified it one way and I did it another! We come up with the same conclusion, Cornell is out and Tom needed the extra to make the cash payment for both Wisebuy and Hacketts!!! Thanks again for your DD!!!!

holter

10/27/07 9:55 AM

#82297 RE: lowtrade #81736

lowtrade, What do you mean by Thomas Scozzafava also owns the poison pill 100k of series "B" preferred? What potential impact would that have on the stock price and health of the company. I have heard the term poision pill before. You are good at explanation. Would you please explain the meaning you have for it in this case?

Sprycel

10/27/07 12:59 PM

#82362 RE: lowtrade #81736

Lowtrade, how about this DD that took me about an hour to calculate:

July 20 I/A as reported on filing 368,626,011
August 16 T/A reported I/A increased to 440,990,177
Difference is 72,364,166 at a conversion price of .00425 = Payment to Cornell of $307,547.71
Note: to come up with the conversion price I took the previous 5 tradings days LOWEST close price and applied the 85% discount per the CD. I did this with all of the following conversion prices also

Sept 12 T/A reported I/A increased to 496,688,075
Difference is 55,697,898 at a conversion price of .0051 = Payment to Cornell of $284,059.28

October 1 T/A reported I/A increased to 627,964,010
Difference is 131,275,958 at a conversion price of .0136 = Payment to Cornell of $1,785,352,72

As of October 1 the total paid to Cornell is $2,376,959
Cornell is more than done in these calculations and they are approximates so you can take a 5% error factor either way.

The last increase was an EVEN 25 million which means the last 25 Million was something else Tom was working on and it just may be the sale of shares to pay cash for the Wisebuy and the Hackett deals as he reported he now has cash ON HAND to complete both transactions.

Now remember, this could of been happening weekly but I used W/E numbers to try to simplfy the calculations!

Now how is that for some BAD A$$ Due Diligence.

See I concur with you, Cornell was done on October 1 and that is why the delay occurred on the 8K filing! Tom was waiting for them to get the hell out of his way!!!

bornlong

10/27/07 1:28 PM

#82372 RE: lowtrade #81736


Additional Facts:
The Hacketts deal also calls for an option pool for Hacketts management of 5% of common; 85% converstion. These are less dilutive as the company will get cash when exercise that helps the BS.

Some speculation:
The options will likely be used to incentivize the Hacketss management team to stay on and vest over several years. This vesting of options may coincide with the future payments on the Hacketts notes. They would excerces their option, the company recieves cash, and the cash is used to pay the notes due on the Hacketts deal. That would be slick in a good way.

investor911

10/28/07 7:06 PM

#82891 RE: lowtrade #81736

Lowtrade- Excellent Post, done or about to be done. Great days ahead.

winnotlose

10/28/07 7:39 PM

#82896 RE: lowtrade #81736

Sir Lowtrade, now that we digested it all, I believe your correct, Tom funded all he needed, and that should be it for the dilution, this is great news!

analogdog

10/28/07 8:12 PM

#82904 RE: lowtrade #81736

IN MY OPINION.. we hear that Cornell is done and out of the picture this week. Nice Halloween treat....