Replies to post #132754 on NeoMedia Technologies, Inc (NEOM)

[jonesieatl]

krays, I don't believe so ..

... I posted this a week ago based on some excellent info brought to the board by jcg and others:

Then, extrapolating from the excellent info jcg brought to us just now ...

"If the PTO orders reexamination, the patent holder is given the opportunity to file a statement concerning the new question of patentability, including amendments or new claims they want to propose[6] (provided, however, that the claims may not be broadened)

I wonder how long Neomedia is given to do THAT, and I wonder how long they might TAKE to do that, or if they will file anything at all at this juncture?.[7]

If the patent holder files such a statement, the statement must be served on the person requesting reexamination, and the requester is given two months to file a reply to the patent owner's statement."

Well, there's two months added to however long Neomedia might take to file a statement with or without amendments or new claims .... IF Neomedia should in fact file anything at all. I suppose if Neomedia is "standing pat" they could immediately notify the USPTO of that fact and there will be no delays on that front. Then we're just back to where we were, how long does the USPTO have to complete a reexam."

jonesie

[success622]

krays,edted: I see from your reply you are asking whether NEOM will submit next, we can follow along on the USPTO site to see what is posted.