GM amazingkarma :) Okay, so as I understand it (and you), we will have to agree to disagree. They are current non-issues as they relate to today's pps. They are an issue with the stock as they are a dormant underpinning to it.
I will continue to post honest responses to board poster's questions and/or concerns. I will continue to point out misstatements by other posters. I believe in this company/stock and also believe it should be shared from all sides-- the awesome, good, bad and ugly.
I am not judging Stockwire's use of e-mails. That seems to be a fair follow-on discussion. I was pointing out the misstatement that the promoters had ceased, save for a profile being maintained on a website.
"Are you looking for something nefarious?" Of course I am. This is an investment of mine so I look at it as my duty to spot posters/people that have an agenda to simply damage any of my investments. Prudent, don't you think?"
Don't have a problem with one being a protectionist -- just be truthful. Fact is fact regardless of whether in an opinion it is a non-issue. I believe it's the difference between sharing freely and sharing to persuade. We have the same desire (stock succeeds), we just disagree on how to express that on this board.
"So yes, I ALWAYS look for something nefarious. I don't dig though because people pretty much show themselves, just some less obvious than others at least at the beginning. And I'm always suspicious of those "longs" that keep posting admitted "non-issues" over and over and over and over again. Seems odd, doesn't it?"
No, I don't under the circumstance I explained above. And to be fair, I have provided the proof, and explained why I do what I do. Are we just going to overlook the reason I posted it-- responding to your post that unfairly labeled it as untruths and attempted to paint me with a nefarious moniker?
Probably not furthering the protection of the stock, but it would do something for one's karma ;)
GLTU
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
