No I didn't, their accountants liked about profts etc. AMD could be lying, IBM could be lying about profits, margins etc. no one really knows. My premise that Intel was following what they believed to be correct and to the best of my knowledge they were not cooking the books.
No I didn't, their accountants liked about profts etc. AMD could be lying, IBM could be lying about profits, margins etc. no one really knows. My premise that Intel was following what they believed to be correct and to the best of my knowledge they were not cooking the books.
Enron tried to cook the books and hide as much as they can so that they can drive up the price of the stock in the short-term. That was plain dishonest.
Intel on the other hand does what it does to compete in the market place. Intel has nothing to hide. Whether it is legal or not is up to the interpretation of anti-trust law.