InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

youhavenoidea

10/16/07 9:45 AM

#293 RE: Chili Palmer #292

Anthony "Warren Buffet" Marotta?

LooooooooooooooooooL
icon url

youhavenoidea

10/16/07 12:31 PM

#294 RE: Chili Palmer #292

Ian Lamphere last deal was a coffee shop LMFAO

Market Pulse Breaking News Alert for Wednesday, August 11, 2004: SYNS -- Synesi, Inc. Signs Letter of Intent to Acquire Port City Coffee Roasters!
Market Wire, August, 2004
Market Pulse News Alert for this AM, Stocks to Watch are: Synesi, Inc. (OTC: SYNS), Alkermes, Inc. (NASDAQ: ALKS), Starbucks Corp. (NASDAQ: SBUX) and Microsoft Corp. (NASDAQ: MSFT).

Investors need to be watching Synesi, Inc. (OTC: SYNS) this AM! Synesi is interested in compelling ventures in world coffee markets that show tremendous room for market share growth. Synesi intends to expand rapidly throughout the Northeast and then nationwide by establishing or acquiring coffee roasters and outlets in model markets. Synesi had great news out after yesterday's bell regarding a potential acquisition! This could be excellent news for investors!

Synesi, Inc. (OTC: SYNS) announced the company has signed a letter of intent to acquire Port City Coffee Roasters, the Portsmouth, NH-based coffee roasting and wholesale company. While the transaction remains subject to the signing of definitive agreements and customary closing conditions, Synesi officials are enthusiastic about the acquisition.

Ian Lamphere, Synesi President and CEO, noted, "Port City Coffee Roasters has achieved popular brand recognition throughout the Northeast for the past fifteen years of its operation. It has proven its profitability, and we are confident that under Synesi ownership, Port City will increase its market share in the Northeast immensely."

icon url

youhavenoidea

10/16/07 12:32 PM

#295 RE: Chili Palmer #292

SO WE HAVE X-BROKERS,COFFESHOP OWNERS AND A BUNCH OF WANNABE WARREN BUFFET'S

ROTF
icon url

youhavenoidea

10/16/07 1:30 PM

#301 RE: Chili Palmer #292

SYNS NEXT??

Spam suspects charged over $4.6m share con
Pump-and-dump
By John Leyden → More by this authorPublished Tuesday 10th July 2007 13:28 GMTTwo Texans have been charged with securities fraud and money laundering offences over a pump-and-dump email stock scam.

The case follows an investigation by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) into the illegal use of pump-and-dump junk mails to promote the sale of at least 13 low-value stocks between May 2005 and December 2006.

Darrel Uselton, 40, and his uncle, Jack Usleton, 69, allegedly used a series of spam emails campaigns to trick the gullible into buying worthless stocks on the basis of bogus insider information. The dynamic duo are suspected of using a network of compromised zombie PCs to distribute junk mail stock tips.

Investigators reckon gullible users were defrauded out of $4.6m in furtherance of the scam before the dodgy duo were caught. The pair allegedly made the mistake of sending one of their fraudulent emails to a SEC lawyer, prompting the launch of an investigation that ultimately led to charges against the two. Texas criminal authorities have seized more than $4.2m from bank accounts associated with the Useltons.

The prosecution of the Useltons is part of a larger SEC crackdown on stock scams. The SEC suspended trading of 35 companies which had been the subject of pump-and-dump emails in March. ®

4 comments posted — Comment period finished

icon url

youhavenoidea

10/16/07 1:32 PM

#302 RE: Chili Palmer #292

WASH TRADING..SYNS NEXT???

SEC Charges Two Texas Swindlers In Penny Stock Spam Scam Involving Computer Botnets
09/07/07

The Securities and Exchange Commission has filed securities fraud charges against two Texas individuals in a high-tech scam that hijacked personal computers nationwide to disseminate millions of spam emails and cheat investors out of more than $4.6 million. The scheme involved the use of so-called computer "botnets" or "proxy bot networks," which are networks comprised of personal computers that, unbeknownst to their owners, are infected with malicious viruses that forward spam or viruses to other computers on the Internet. The scheme began to unravel, however, when a Commission enforcement attorney received one of the spam emails at work.

The Commission alleges that Darrel Uselton and his uncle, Jack Uselton, both recidivist securities law violators, illegally profited during a 20-month "scalping" scam by obtaining shares from at least 13 penny stock companies and selling those shares into an artificially active market they created through manipulative trading, spam email campaigns, direct mailers, and Internet-based promotional activities. Scalping refers to recommending that others purchase a security while secretly selling the same security in the market.

In related enforcement actions, the Attorney General's Office for Texas and the Harris County District Attorney's Office indicted the Useltons for engaging in organized criminal activity and money laundering. The Texas criminal authorities also have seized more than $4.2 million from bank accounts associated with the Useltons.

"This latest step in the Commission's anti-spam initiative is intended to protect investors from fraud artists who would treat the investing public as their personal ATM machines," said SEC Chairman Christopher Cox. "The use of bots to spread investment spam at exponentially higher rates is making this type of fraud an even more virulent threat to ordinary investors. Not only are victims getting hit with get-rich-quick spam, but by turning the victims' computers into zombies, these fraudsters are sending out still more spam to others. Given estimates that up to one-quarter of all personal computers connected to the Internet are part of a botnet, and the thriving market in selling lists of compromised computers to hackers and spammers, the SEC is taking this very seriously. We remain aggressively committed to tracking down anyone attempting to use bots to prey on investors with false or misleading spam about securities."

Linda Chatman Thomsen, SEC Director of Enforcement, said, "The scheme executed by the Useltons reflects a widespread contempt for investors and the marketplace. We will track down the swindlers engaged in these fraudulent schemes and hold them accountable."

The Commission's complaint, filed in U.S. District Court in Houston, alleges that the Useltons orchestrated a series of spam email campaigns using an array of computer botnets to anonymously flood the inboxes of American investors with millions of spam emails touting near-worthless penny stocks with baseless price projections and other unfounded claims. Each campaign, which featured a single company, lasted anywhere from several days to several weeks.

The Commission alleges that between May 2005 and December 2006, the Useltons obtained more than $4.6 million through their fraudulent scheme. According to the complaint, the Useltons and the companies they controlled typically received unrestricted shares from penny stock companies for little or no money, in return for purported financing or promotional activities.

The Commission's complaint alleges that the Useltons violated the antifraud provisions of Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder. The Commission seeks permanent injunctions, disgorgement with prejudgment interest, and civil penalties against each of the individual defendants, as well as penny stock bars against the Useltons.

Darrel Uselton was disciplined by the National Association of Securities Dealers (NASD) in 2004 and 2005. Jack Uselton was permanently enjoined by the Commission from violating the anti-fraud provision in a 2002 settled action.

The company stocks that were the subject of the Useltons’ spam campaign, according to the SEC’s complaint, included Oretech, Inc.; Intelligent Sports, Inc.; Advanced Powerline Technologies; Notch Novelty Corporation; Avondale Resources Corporation; Spooz, Inc.; ESPRE Solutions, Inc.; Grifco International, Inc.; Leatt Corporation; Adrenaline Nation Entertainment, Inc.; Equipment and Systems Engineering, Inc.; Gulf Petroleum Exchange, Inc. (currently Software Effective Solutions Corp.); and Wentworth Energy, Inc.

The SEC in March 2007 suspended trading in the securities of three of the companies (Advanced Powerline Technologies, Leatt Corporation, and Software Effective Solutions Corp.) as part of its anti-spam initiative. The SEC revoked the registration of the securities of Oretech, Inc. in December 2005.

The Commission acknowledges the assistance of the Attorney General's offices for New York and Texas, The Harris County (Houston, Texas) District Attorney's Office, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Texas State Securities Board, the State of Oklahoma Department of Securities, the National Association of Securities Dealers and the National Cyber-Forensics and Training Alliance.

The Commission's investigation is continuing.

Additional materials: Litigation Release No. LR-20187
icon url

youhavenoidea

10/16/07 3:14 PM

#303 RE: Chili Palmer #292

Watch how the scammers paint the tape at the close to finish it up higher or flat..Never fails..They're eventually going to get nailed by the SEC AND WHO KNOWS WHO ELSE
icon url

youhavenoidea

10/16/07 3:16 PM

#304 RE: Chili Palmer #292

SEC Center for Complaints and Enforcement Tips
Through this page you can file a complaint or provide us with tips on potential securities law violations. We welcome hearing from you because your information may alert us to a bad broker or firm, an unfair practice in the securities industry that needs to be changed, or the latest fraud.

How Do I Reach the SEC?
There are several ways to file a complaint:

Complaints - Use one of our online forms to file your complaint electronically.

Tips - Report a potential violation of the securities laws directly to enforcement@sec.gov. Please do not use this email box for general comments or questions.


http://www.sec.gov/complaint.shtml

Spams - Forward investment-related spam e-mails to enforcement@sec.gov.

Questions - Use our "Fast Answers" web page for general questions about the federal securities laws or your investments.
If you do not want to communicate electronically, either print and fill out a form or write us a letter. Our address is: SEC Complaint Center, 100 F Street NE, Washington, D.C. 20549-0213. You can also send a fax to 202-772-9295.
Whistleblower Protection: If you work for a publicly traded company and have been fired, demoted, suspended, threatened, harassed, or discriminated against for reporting a potential shareholder fraud to a supervisor, federal regulator, or member of Congress, then please contact OSHA’S Office of Investigative Assistance right away. OSHA is the federal agency that investigates and handles these sorts of "whistleblower" complaints.

What Information Should I Provide?
We can best respond to you if we receive accurate and complete information. Though you are not required to furnish any more information than you wish, critical information for us to completely evaluate your complaint or tip includes:

Your name, mail and email addresses, and telephone numbers.

The name, mail and email addresses, telephone numbers, and website address of any individual or company you mention in the complaint.

If you have a complaint about a security or a securities salesperson, specific details of how, why, and when you were defrauded or encountered problems with investments or your broker or adviser.
What Happens After I Send Information to the SEC?
We thoroughly review and evaluate your information so that we may refer it to the appropriate SEC office. The Office of Investor Education and Advocacy will handle certain general questions about the securities laws and complaints relating to financial professionals or a complainant's personal financial matters. The professionals in this office can counsel you regarding possible remedies and may, under appropriate circumstances, approach brokerage firms, advisers or other financial professional concerning matters you have raised.

Attorneys in the Division of Enforcement evaluate information and tips concerning violations of the federal securities laws. It is the general policy of the SEC to conduct its investigations on a confidential basis to preserve the integrity of its investigative process as well as to protect persons against whom unfounded charges may be made or where the SEC determines that enforcement action is not necessary or appropriate.

Subject to the provisions of the Freedom of Information Act, the SEC cannot disclose the existence or non-existence of an investigation and any information gathered unless made a matter of public record in proceedings brought before the SEC or in the courts. You can find information about public enforcement actions on our Web site.



http://www.sec.gov/complaint.shtml

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Contact | Employment | Links | FOIA | Forms | Privacy Modified: 07/31/2007

icon url

youhavenoidea

10/16/07 3:18 PM

#305 RE: Chili Palmer #292

Litigation
This page provides information on SEC enforcement actions, opinions issued by the Commission, briefs filed by SEC staff, trading suspensions, and notices concerning the creation of investors claims funds in specific cases.

Litigation Releases - Federal Court Actions

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Administrative Proceedings - Notices & Settlements

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ALJ Initial Decisions & Orders
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Reports of Investigations
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commission Opinions & Orders
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Trading Suspensions
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Investors Claims Funds
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Amicus / Friend of the Court Briefs
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Appellate Court Briefs
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SEC Rules of Practice
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SEC Rules on Fair Fund and Disgorgement Plans
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

http://www.sec.gov/litigation.shtml
icon url

youhavenoidea

10/16/07 3:19 PM

#306 RE: Chili Palmer #292



Division of Enforcement
The Division of Enforcement investigates possible violations of securities laws, recommends Commission action when appropriate, either in a federal court or before an administrative law judge, and negotiates settlements.

About the Division
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Enforcement Actions
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Federal Court Actions

Administrative Proceedings

ALJ Initial Decisions & Orders

Commission Opinions


Trading Suspensions
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Investors Claims Funds
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Internet Enforcement Program
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Delinquent Filings Program
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Prime Bank Fraud Information Center
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Insider Trading Bounty Program
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Investor Alerts
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Selected Accounting and Auditing Enforcement Releases
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tips & Complaints
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------




http://www.sec.gov/divisions/enforce.shtml

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Contact | Employment | Links | FOIA | Forms | Privacy Modified: 04/25/2007
icon url

youhavenoidea

10/16/07 3:20 PM

#307 RE: Chili Palmer #292

We have sent off some emails here TOO. Yup, we're RATS

Insider Trading: Information on Bounties

Section 21A(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ("Exchange Act") [15 U.S.C. 78u-l(e)] authorizes the Securities and Exchange Commission ("Commission") to award a bounty to a person who provides information leading to the recovery of a civil penalty from an insider trader, from a person who "tipped" information to an insider trader, or from a person who directly or indirectly controlled an insider trader. This pamphlet is designed to provide interested persons with information on bounties and the Commission's rules for making a bounty application. Section 21A(e) of the Exchange Act and the Commission's bounty rules are set out at the end of this pamphlet.

What is "Insider Trading?"
"Insider trading" refers generally to buying or selling a security, in breach of a fiduciary duty or other relationship of trust and confidence, while in possession of material, nonpublic information about the security. Insider trading violations may also include "tipping" such information, securities trading by the person "tipped" and securities trading by those who misappropriate such information. Examples of insider trading cases that have been brought by the Commission are cases against: corporate officers, directors, and employees who traded the corporation's securities after learning of significant, confidential corporate developments; friends, business associates, family members, and other "tippees" of such officers, directors, and employees, who traded the securities after receiving such information; employees of law, banking, brokerage and printing firms who were given such information in order to provide services to the corporation whose securities they traded; government employees who learned of such information because of their employment by the government; and other persons who misappropriated, and took advantage of, confidential information from their employers.
Because insider trading undermines investor confidence in the fairness and integrity of the securities markets, the Commission has treated the detection and prosecution of insider trading violations as one of its enforcement priorities.

How Much May be Paid as a Bounty?
Insider trading may result in enforcement action by the Commission or in criminal prosecution by the Department of Justice. The Exchange Act permits the Commission to bring suit against insider traders to seek injunctions, which are court orders that prohibit violations of the law under threat of fines and imprisonment. The Commission may also seek other relief against insider traders, including recovery of any illegal gains (or losses avoided) and payment of a civil penalty. The amount of a civil penalty can be up to three times the profit gained (or loss avoided) as a result of insider trading.
The Commission is permitted to make bounty awards from the civil penalties that are actually recovered from violators. With minor exceptions, any person who provides information leading to the imposition of a civil penalty may be paid a bounty. However the total amount of bounties that may be paid from a civil penalty may not exceed ten percent of that penalty.

How Will the Commission Make Bounty Determinations?
All Commission determinations regarding bounties including whether to make a payment, to whom a payment shall be made, and the amount of a payment (if any), are in the sole discretion of the Commission. Any such determination is final and not subject to judicial review. Nothing in the Commission's rules or in this pamphlet is intended to limit the Commission's discretion with respect to bounties.
In making determinations regarding bounty applications the Commission will be guided by the purposes of the bounty provisions. These purposes include the intent of the United States Congress to encourage persons with information about possible insider trading to come forward. The Commission will also consider other factors that it deems relevant. Examples of other factors that may be relevant are: the importance of the information provided by an applicant; whether the information was provided voluntarily; the existence of other applications in the matter; and the amount of the penalty from which bounties may be paid.

Normally, the Commission will not make any determination on a bounty application until a payment of a penalty is both ordered by a court and recovered. A person who files an application meeting the requirements of the Commission's rules will be notified of the Commission's determination on the application.

How and When Do You Apply for a Bounty?
An application must be clearly marked as an "Application for Award of a Bounty," and must contain the information required by the Commission's rules. The application must give a detailed statement of the information that the applicant has about the suspected insider trading.
Any person who desires to provide information to the Commission that may result in the payment of a bounty may do so by any means desired. The Commission encourages persons having information regarding insider trading to provide that information in writing, either at the time they initially provide the information to the Commission or as soon as possible afterwards. Providing information in writing reduces the possibility of error, helps assure that appropriate action will be taken, and minimizes subsequent burdens and the possibility of factual disputes. In any event, a written application for a bounty must be filed within 180 days after the day on which the court orders payment of the civil penalty.

Can You Apply for a Bounty Anonymously?
The Commission recognizes that there may be instances when a bounty applicant wishes to remain temporarily anonymous. The bounty rules take these instances into account. While the Commission will only award bounties to applicants who provide their identity and mailing address, that information may be added by a later amendment to the application. The amendment must be filed within 180 days after the entry of the court order requiring the payment of the penalty upon which the bounty is based. An anonymous applicant who fails to file such an amendment (and anyone who fails to make a written application) runs the risk of losing eligibility for a bounty through lapse of time and ignorance of the fact that a penalty has been recovered.
Absent compelling cause, the Commission ordinarily does not disclose the identity of a confidential source. In some instances however disclosure of that identity will be legally required, or will be essential for the protection of the public interest. For example, a court may order disclosure during litigation, or the Commission may need to present the testimony of a bounty claimant to ensure the success of an enforcement action. Consequently while the Commission and its staff will give serious consideration to requests to maintain the confidentiality of a source's identity, no guarantees of confidentiality are possible.

Statutory and Regulatory Provisions

Section 21A(e) of the Exchange Act
[T]here shall be paid from amounts imposed as a penalty under this section and recovered by the Commission or the Attorney General, such sums, not to exceed 10 percent of such amounts, as the Commission deems appropriate to the person or persons who provide information leading to the imposition of such penalty. Any determinations under this subsection, including whether, to whom, or in what amount to make payment, shall be in the sole discretion of the Commission, except that no such payment shall be made to any member, officer, or employee of any appropriate regulatory agency, the Department of Justice, or a self-regulatory organization. Any such determination shall be final and not subject to judicial review.

Subpart C of Part 201 of Title 17 of the Code of Federal Regulations
Procedures Pertaining to the Payment of Bounties Pursuant to Subsection 21A(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Rule 61 Scope of subpart
Section 21A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 authorizes the courts to impose civil penalties for certain violations of that Act. Subsection 21A(e) permits the Commission to award bounties to persons who provide information that leads to the imposition of such penalties. Any such determination, including whether, to whom, or in what amount to make payments, is in the sole discretion of the Commission. This subpart sets forth procedures regarding applications for the award of bounties pursuant to subsection 21A(e). Nothing in this subpart shall be deemed to limit the discretion of the Commission with respect to determinations under subsection 21A(e) or to subject any such determination to judicial review.

Rule 62 Application required.
No person shall be eligible for the payment of a bounty under subsection 21A(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 unless such person has filed a written application that meets the requirements of this subpart and, upon request, provides such other information as the Commission or its staff deems relevant to the application.

Rule 63 Time and place of filing.
Each application pursuant to this subpart and each amendment thereto must be filed within one hundred eighty days after the entry of the court order requiring the payment of the penalty that is subject to the application. Such applications and amendments shall be addressed to: Office of the Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE, Washington, DC 20549-9303.

Rule 64 Form of application and information required.
Each application pursuant to this subpart shall be identified as an Application for Award of a Bounty and shall contain a detailed statement of the information provided by the applicant that the applicant believes led or may lead to the imposition of a penalty. Except as provided by Rule 65 of this subpart, each application shall state the identity and mailing address of, and be signed by, the applicant. When the application is not the means by which the applicant initially provides such information, each application shall contain: the dates and times upon which, and the means by which, the information was provided; the identity of the Commission staff members to whom the information was provided; and, if the information was provided anonymously, sufficient further information to confirm that the person filing the application is the same person who provided the information to the Commission.

Rule 65 Identity and signature.
Applications pursuant to this subpart may omit the identity, mailing address, and signature of the applicant; provided that such identity, mailing address and signature are submitted by an amendment to the application. Any such amendment must be filed within one hundred eighty days after the entry of the court order requiring the payment of the penalty that is subject to the application.

Rule 66 Notice to applicants.
The Commission will notify each person who files an application that meets the requirements of this subpart, at the address specified in such application, of the Commission's determination with respect to such person's application. Nothing in this subpart shall be deemed to entitle any person to any other notice from the Commission or its staff.

Rule 67 Applications by legal guardians.
An application pursuant to this subpart may be filed by an executor, administrator, or other legal representative of a person who provides information that may be subject to a bounty payment or by the parent or guardian of such a person if that person is a minor. Certified copies of the letters testamentary, letters of administration, or other similar evidence showing the authority of the legal representative to file the application must be annexed to the application.

Rule 68 No promises of payment.
No person is authorized under this subpart to make any offer or promise, or otherwise to bind the Commission with respect to the payment of any bounty or the amount thereof.



http://www.sec.gov/divisions/enforce/insider.htm



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Home | Previous Page Modified: 01/06/2006

icon url

youhavenoidea

10/16/07 4:04 PM

#322 RE: Chili Palmer #292

It's going to get better after we post NYC court documents

rut ro shaggy