InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

TopHat

10/14/07 3:45 PM

#22661 RE: dirtdog #22656

Dirt.

1. The questions you asked have been sooooooo repeatedly answered over and over. But, for hopefully the last time, please review post: http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=23472627
of particular note: "(Example: In drilling the Mesa, Tom and others were told by the driller that we will start drilling "next week." Tom shares this info and the driller does not show up. No one lied but the driller. Tom told those who called what the present reality was. {For a further point: the one's who complained and demanded info: now, now, now, seemed to be the first to shout: Tom lied!!!!, when Tom told them what the driller had communicated to him. The driller was the one who did not fulfill his word.} BTW: I'm not defending Tom here, I am only explaining the difference between realities at different points, even though the end goal basically is the same.) The point is that the Mesa WAS drilled as Tom said that EDEX would drill the Mesa, not on EDEX's timeline, but the drillers. An issue over which EDEX had little control. The completion is planned to be finished up in the next few months."

2. You ask: "why predict?" Ask Tom, not me. Ask the BoD, not me. Why fight me about it. This too is a very old discussion which was addressed and readdressed over and over back when it was a timely issue.

3. We had only 33% at Mesa if my memory is correct. We were not the lead. This too is old news. Again, why argue with me over this, call the source and take your questions there.

4. Your use of the term "outlandish" is the very type of thing that shows hidden motives and agendas and bring emotion into the discussion which has no place. Please stick to facts and quit the accusations. If Tom is told by a driller: "next week" and he passes that info on to those who call or the whiners who keep demanding a pr, than that is not outlandish. It is the most up to date information. It is an insult for you to even use the term! A word to the wise: quit it.

5. I agree that proving the field is a ways off.