InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

TheNoviceChicago

10/14/07 11:49 AM

#47911 RE: puppydotcom #47909

That's all the more reason to make as much of an effort as possible to change someone else's thinking. I have concern for people, who believe the unbelievable. I don't bother with RB, but from what I hear, there are many believers there. How many of you go over there to voice opinions? Why bother? Let's have the believers there and the non-believers here and we can all just say nothing. If nothing else, the benefit to the debate is for the lurkers, who don't post. Many people don't bother. But they do read. If nothing else, have the debate for them. Personally, I think that little company statement came, because of some of the debate happening in places just like this. If that's true, the debate can at least show a company that investors are tired of the scam and it's time to either do something real or shut it down.
icon url

extra

10/14/07 12:01 PM

#47912 RE: puppydotcom #47909

According to some on other sites, public pumpers can be personally sued, when their "favorite" scam goes bankrupt, or loses in court, and does not pay. The most vulnerable of those forever faithful pumpers, are those with U.S. assets, that a P.I. could find in 10 minutes. And, the lawyer that hired the P.I. could "attach" the next day that court is in session.

You said: "Ignorance is no excuse in the eyes of the equities market!"

I add: "Ignorance is no excuse in the eyes of the law!"
And: "Ignorance can be expensive, especially when publicly advertised."

imo