InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

mouton29

10/09/07 9:03 PM

#4898 RE: rancherho #4897

" an acquistion by another company generally wipes out the tax loss"

That's close to right if the company does not have much in the way of assets other than its NOL. If there is an ownership change, the losses after the change can generally only be used to the extent of a published tax-exempt rate (4.5% in October) multiplied by the equity value of the company. So if the market cap were, say, $100 million, the NOL could be used each year to the extent of $4.5 million. The tax savings from that would be, say, $1.8 million; so the value of the NOL is the present value of $1.8 million per year in this example. GTOP's NOL would expire after a while, mostly unused, in that example.

On the other hand, if the company had an approved drug and was worth, say, $500 million, the NOL could be used to a much greater extent.

icon url

thatsnot luck

10/16/07 11:16 AM

#4920 RE: rancherho #4897

rancherho, i too find the value attributed to tax loss carry forwards excessive in many cases. however, i think it could have value in a reverse merger (i.e., a profitable biotech is 'acquired' by the one with TLCF), but need to be careful about relative size and share ownership distribution post merger. at least that is my understanding (i am NOT a tax expert). so i think it is theoretically possible to get full (or nearly full) value for TLCF, in practice i think it is more wishful thinking than actual money in the bank.