InvestorsHub Logo

design333

10/08/07 6:56 PM

#3660 RE: ClayTrader #3658

sounds good. any thoughts on TARR & LUM? I am in both.

exisnet

10/08/07 7:10 PM

#3661 RE: ClayTrader #3658

Another excellent lesson thanks with a mark...

givememymoney

10/16/07 1:55 PM

#3847 RE: ClayTrader #3658

aj 5 day rule here? thanks for your help


Cee-It

01/24/08 11:02 AM

#7531 RE: ClayTrader #3658

Nice post because of nice historical record it establishes... BUT, many of those examples of GAPS have since filled.

My RULE would be this -- if you are a long term investor you should ALWAYS fear the GAP, buying after a GAP with the intention to HOLD for a long term is a mistake in a high percentage of cases --- if you are a swing trader, you should trade very cautiously after a GAP, and don't be surprised after three months to see an old GAP fill, when you sense it coming GET OUT and WAIT FOR IT. After all, missing an OPPORTUNITY in the market is no big deal if you avoid being wrong a high percentage of the time by passing. There are more opportunities than you will EVER have money to capitalize on them, so PASS when there is a threatening factor involved and look for something else.... or BE VERY CAREFUL.


MACH1

03/29/08 11:13 AM

#12293 RE: ClayTrader #3658

The last time you showed us this rule we exploded to .185!

GO AQUI!!

MarketGeometry

10/02/08 12:21 AM

#28117 RE: ClayTrader #3658

Question about Gap filled. Does the gap have to be filled by the real body or it can be filled by the shadows? For example
ABK gap in late Aug was filled earlier by upper shadow in Jul 8 (price 2.88). Also gap in Aug 12 was filled by lower shadow on Aug 20(price 3.71). But you mentioned in your ABK charting
analysis video gap has to be filled. Can you explain how you are reaching that conclusion?

Thanks
pipul

mrsdoubtfire

10/24/13 9:25 AM

#48944 RE: ClayTrader #3658

Very good thanks I look into it