InvestorsHub Logo

FoggontheTyne

10/04/07 11:12 AM

#604 RE: aries4747 #603

Well this looks all very fine and dandy, but they are having to do a heck of a lot of denying and protesting.

By the way I have contacted Tom Konrad and had a response from him, just in case you are interested. I think these investigative analysts do a good job.


However precisely what the job is they need to do requires a bit of defining. My feeling is that these start-ups get themselves into a big mess of their own making and acquire some strange bedfellows, eg Aston Rowe. I still don't know if Mobilestream Oil were anything more than 2 men, Mary Radomsky and a dog plus fax and laptop. Do they have a working business? I don't know. It all looks like a load of cheerleading to me.

Anyone can quote graphs and expert reports. Admittedly there is some process they have with pictures of apparatus producing tar, but if UK inbvestors are left to scrabble around for guidance in the midst of a complex corporate manoeuvre this is no good.

My family members who really didn't intend to invest in Mobilestream, but who were persuaded to do so, don't deserve to be ditched when the whole deal was more or less forced on them. They are shareholders and have a right to be supported, kept informed and not used as easy money.

So please will Mobilestream Oil/Global Resource take note that certain people are on their trail and respond more constructively eg Jeff Andrews. I have sent you an email and I bet you are checking this board out.