InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

wing_walker

10/02/07 5:37 PM

#31284 RE: Jenny_Garner #31282

Jenny, link to the following please;

"We will never get those SWARM figures again actually. That is what Paul stated if I remember it right."
icon url

wing_walker

10/03/07 4:56 AM

#31355 RE: Jenny_Garner #31282

Jenny_Garner. Sorry, you have this information wrong too.

"We will never get those SWARM figures again actually. That is what Paul stated if I remember it right."


I disagree with your statement because 141 Capital is an independent entity that was spawned by Spooz to enable Spooz to comply with regs in order that Spooz could market SWARM. If you peel back the layers of 141 Capital, you will see Paul behind it. Accordingly, if asked is Paul going to announce SWARM results the answer can be found on the 141 website;

http://141capital.com/home

You categorically stated that Paul will never announce SWARM results at all. Do you have first hand knowledge of this? Could it be that Spooz will not announce SWARM results due to a conflict of interests But SWARM results will be announced by 141 Capital ? According to the link above, there is indeed a window for the track record of SWARM. Is there not?

IMO, the question should be; How does Paul comply with the rules, market SWARM technology and in turn reward his loyal shareholders?

Based on the above information how do you account for your departure from what Paul said about giving Spooz shareholders a dividend (gift) versus what you are implying that he is somehow not being fair to his shareholders?