Ninertango wrote:
I don't think it should be our responsibilty to have to be detectives
I agree; I've been saying as much for a very long time. I'm not sure what the best 'lever' is. I know that many want to threaten legal action. Many people seem to believe that PA and RB are crooks; if they actually are (FWIW, I do not believe that to be the case), what good does threatening legal action do? It might just hasten the loading of jets with cash to be deposited in off-shore banks! (That was supposed to be a joke!) Also, many believe that PBLS' management does not appreciate receiving 'constructive criticism' and often responds by basically saying "Go Pound Sand... or sell your shares if you don't like it." So forcing the issue may not be productive. Where does that leave us? IMHO, the best place to start is by contacting PBLS management in a courteous and professional manner and request that PBLS operate per their organizational chart (i.e., investors uber allis) and provide factual information on what has happened (what went right and want went wrong, what they learned, what they plan on doing going forward) and make an honest commitment to become transparent ASAP. If that does not work, well, PBLS management will have forced investors to seek other alternate sources of recourse. JMHO
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
