InvestorsHub Logo

holycow

10/02/07 1:30 PM

#54276 RE: wanaB #54273

wanaB, while perhaps just a rumor, right now, it is music to my ears and I will take it gladly as opposed to many here with a much higher threshhold before they are willing to believe. Even though uncomfirmed, it seems like tentative good tidings indeed. I always felt they would be able to raise the money because of the objective situation of the potential as I understand it (which, as fearfrost points out in a general way, is quite imperfect as any investor never has complete information). In this situation, it is really an evaluation about who is credible, who you believe. For some time now, it has boiled down to that for me, "Ah believe". I have acted accordingly and have used as my watch word what the Reagan people suggested we do in 1982: "stay the course" or, if you prefer: "go the distance" (from the movie "Field of Dreams").


bigworld

10/02/07 3:16 PM

#54279 RE: wanaB #54273

wanaB: Say you are the WanaVax Corporation, in the business of developing a DNA vaccine. Pre-clinical studies come first, run on a series of animal models and usually concluding with primate testing. The amounts of DNA required for pre-clinical testing are minute, perhaps enough for thirty mice, 30 rabbits and 15 chimps. Assuming some favorable data you apply to the FDA for an IND. In Phase I testing the number of human subjects is small. Say on the order of 20-50 participants. If the vaccine shows promise you move on to Phase II. A larger study, but still not the quantities of synDNA that will move the money barometer. Participants in Phase II will probably number around 100. If you make it into Phase III testing the number of participants increases, but it would not exceed 1000-1500 in all probability. So from pre-clinical through Phase III you would only need to obtain enough syndDNA for a few thousand vaccines at most. That is not a large quantity of plasmid. Certainly not enough to generate sufficient profit for the DNA producer. The payoff comes after a full FDA approval. Then you see the demand in the Millions for a vaccine with worldwide application. But it takes 8-10 years from pre-clinical to market, and more importantly it takes hundreds of millions of dollars.
So I reitterate my concerns about the actual market for synDNA over the next 5 years. Even if CYGX were to convince multiple DNA vaccine makers to utilize synDNA, the potential market will continue to be rather low until a vaccine gains approval. Of the DNA vaccine makers out there today only Vical seems poised to release a vaccine in the next 3 years, and they are not a potential customer. CYGX has to find a way to survive 5-8 more years for the potential payoffs that comes with approved vaccines. You've seen the synDNA sales number so far. Not even in the hundreds of thousands yet. The small numbers correspond to pre-clinical and Phase I utilization. Any substantial orders are 5 years away, at best.
The question is, how does CYGX survive that long?