Replies to post #38811 on 1812 Brewing Company Inc (KEGS)

[crooked33]

well let's see here...

Original plan was for 60% ownership...done...finalized (as it's Tom's stake I believe)...but in the interest of the company and shareholders Tom was to get us an additional 15% bringing us to 75%...

but perhaps the audit and financials onw inclusive of hacketts shed some light on some things??? like GREATER profits maybe???...so he comes up with a new plan for 100%...which takes time and negotiations

Instead of you and I getting in a pissing match here...can you please just give me one example of something Tom has not followed through on or done that is not in the best interest of shareholders...if the answer is 'no' then just relax dude

no need to cast doubt at this time...especially now...TOM in all caps deserves better...he has done nothing but benefit shareholders here...

[stickfigurefred]

My guess is they have an executed agreement in place from the previous PR when we were looking at partial ownership, but with the new arrangement they were executing a new one or amending the old one. Either way I believe we have at least one executed agreement on the table so we can't lose. The fundamentals of going from 75% to full merger are astronomical. I see nothing wrong with this at all. No lies, no dirty little secrets. He has been fully transparent with us from all angles as far as I can see. Re-negotiation and aspects change on a dime in the business world. My money is hedging on Tom to put the best deal together for all parties involved. I have called and verified O/S today as well, unchanged for weeks, still 479mil, I for one am always suspect of dilution, but that has not happened here and further bolsters my appreciation for what I have. If some twinks wanna take it down with a panic so be it, you can't keep a good stock down, all imo :)

Fred