InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Mighty_Mezz

09/04/07 2:51 PM

#9357 RE: money66 #9354

What a pack of lies! Here are some of the more blatant ones:

Universal Express' case against the SEC

Company's request for an initial jury trial

direct contrast to the judicial rules

awarded $700,000,000 for naked short selling

retaliatory case brought by the SEC

has already destroyed over 10,000 small public companies


RA apparently doesn't realize that sticking both feet in his mouth leaves him without a leg to stand on.

icon url

janice shell

09/04/07 3:02 PM

#9358 RE: money66 #9354

Universal Express will file a stay in the Appellate Court, and will hold the actions of the Court responsible for any adverse reactions.

Why doesn't he just DO it, rather than merely saying he plans to do it? I imagine he means "file FOR" a stay...

Any lawyers out there? Is it actually possible to file in Appellate Court to stay a ruling made in a lower court? You can, of course, appeal a ruling, but can you file a motion to stay?

Something tells me Fluffy's gonna find his appellate board as "capricious" as he does Judge Lynch.