Replies to post #54334 on FAT CATS

[TraderDog]

WTF is wrong with you? Must have lost a nice chunk of cash on this stock...

[TikiGal]

Can you prove this statement of yours and I would like to know how?

BTW! I can guarantee to you that neither Serf nor I own one share of FCCN! Nor do we have any involvement with any parties affiliated with the merger.


Organized, Premeditated Manipulation IS NOT!

And how can you prove that isn't taking place on the FCCN Board?

I would be more than glad to ask the SEC to ck into some of the posters on that Board and to see what part they may play in this merger that may not be disclosed in their profile.

Could make for an interesting turn around in events here. IMO

[Tina]

Hey W3!

I can't speak for anyone else here because I don't know what anyone else's intentions are.

I can only speak for myself. If one day I saw FCCN moving like it's on fire, heck yeah, I'd jump in just to ride a few tics. Does that mean I like them? Heck, I don't even have to know what they are to be truthful with you because I wouldn't be in more than a few minutes at the most.

I didn't read all of the "jam" because I go to bed earlier than most but in my opinion, (and serf can correct me if I'm wrong) infistocks is more TA based so I can see it being positive there. It's possible they don't like the fundamentals on this board.

I'm really not into the stock jam as serfy can tell ya. I love his stock site but don't post much when it comes to the negativities in reference to pinks because I just consider them plays and don't waste time doing any DD on them (something BRIG has drilled into my skull).

I guess in short what I'm trying to say is that a stock can be positive in a technical way but a major POS in a fundamentally. Make sense?

Wish ya luck though!

[lady*b]

You're definition of bashing is "very interesting" as well.
Sorry you don't approve of discussions on non-stock specific boards. We supported our discussion with direct links and files.

Your complaint was a safeguard. Heck, if any stock site was
intentionally manipulating a stock I would suggest the same route.

Good luck with your complaint. I guess I'll be hearing your real name around the water cooler very soon. :)

[jimmenknee]

There are mutli-dimensions to any stock. Especially more complicated are the pennystocks. Seeing things from all sides and calling them as you see them makes for a more well-"rounded" understanding of the potential "sharp" angles.

I understand that this may not be present at the FCCN board, and if I read some of your posting history correctly, you don't like that there. Isn't that potentially more manipulative? So have you also filed a complaint with the SEC against that board?

[lady*b]

Did you edit your very long post or am I seeing things???

[lady*b]

Posted by: W3Research
In reply to: Tina Marie who wrote msg# 54331 Date:8/28/2007 6:22:51 PM
Post #of 54335

I'm always Nice ... I just don't ...

Think people who have an organized, premeditated
Bash Jam Fest while holding the same Stock in a
different light on their Website is Kosher.

Way too "Over The Top" in my Book.

It's got nothing to do with FCCN
specifically, or Peacock or whatever.

It's got to do with Bashing one place while on
a Public Website Posting something different.

Irrational Exuberance, either Pro or Con,
in the Penny Stocks is forgiven ...

Organized, Premeditated Manipulation IS NOT!

And, yes ... a Complaint WAS SENT IN.

I warned people here the other night about
their "IRONIC, VERY INTERESTING WEBSITE"
in a subtle way. They just kept at it.

So ...

[lady*b]

don't worry- I know how to get back to the edited posts. Thanks for stopping by.