InvestorsHub Logo

CyberCall™

08/28/07 8:37 AM

#8907 RE: CyberCall™ #8905

NETCERT incorporated in Colorado:

Summary ID Number: 20041247737
Name: NetCert, Inc.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Registered Agent: CORPORATION SERVICE COMPANY
Registered Agent Street Address: 1560 Broadway Ste 2090, Denver, CO 80202, United States
Registered Agent Mailing Address:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Principal Office Street Address: 91 Strawberry Hill, Unit 124, Stamford, CT 06902, United States
Principal Office Mailing Address:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status: Noncompliant
Form: Corporation
Jurisdiction: Colorado
Formation Date: 07/15/2004
Term of Duration: Perpetual
Annual Report Month: March

http://www.sos.state.co.us/biz/BusinessEntityDetail.do;jsessionid=0000XMUwAA_inm9EKLmGJQNazOA:11nm16...

I see some other docs here listing Mel Rich:
http://www.sos.state.co.us/biz/ViewImage.do;jsessionid=0000XMUwAA_inm9EKLmGJQNazOA:11nm16ef4?masterF...

So,,,,looks like some Uncle B's Bakery with a JASON WONG changed their name from Uncles Bs to NetCert in 2005 per:
http://www.sos.state.co.us/biz/ViewImage.do;jsessionid=0000XMUwAA_inm9EKLmGJQNazOA:11nm16ef4?masterF...

Then,,,,,,,from NetCert to ISBL it changed in July 2006, and then in Sept 2006....NetCert files a REGDEX document saying that it will sell securites exempt from Reg D of the SEC.

If they merged with ISBL in July 2006.......why is a Net Cert filing in September 2006 valid?

Here is the SEC fililng for NetCert on the REGDEX. Which means, Regulation D Exempt.
Form Formats Description Filing Date File/Film No
REGDEX [html][text] 1 KB [Paper]Notice of Sale of Securities [Regulation D and Section 4(6) of the Securities Act of 1933], item 04
Acc-no: 9999999997-06-041204 (34 Act) 2006-09-25 021-95384
06048609


Anyways, I don't want to fight with anyone. I've learned over the years, that sometimes the dirtiest scams are the ones to spike hard and fast. It's the ones that I like.........So, I use reverse psychology when investing......I become aggresive...... while I investigate, and then decide to buy. I bought ISBL last week of July @ .004 about 1mln...then bought some more up @ .006....then sold 1/2 average .0037.....should i buy back in before this dirty little scam spikes hard?

ghcnj

08/28/07 9:04 AM

#8913 RE: CyberCall™ #8905

You have been answered numerous times. I will not respond to a non shareholder who sold their position in ISBL in the .003's and now the stock is running away from them. All I will say to you is OUCH too bad and good bye. GLTA ISBL shareholders.

sidedraft

08/28/07 9:30 AM

#8915 RE: CyberCall™ #8905

File a complaint with the SEC. Give them every detail that you continue to post here, make sure that you say the same thing over and over, so that they get.

Post what results you get from the SEC. I for one get your point and would not like to see you mention it again, and again, and again, ah......well, you get it!

mastaflash

08/28/07 10:27 AM

#8926 RE: CyberCall™ #8905

You've made your point I believe.