GregS/Zeev: I'm not asking...
for your intervention on my behalf. I'm merely using you as examples of respected posters, along with Larry Dudash, who have visited the WAVE board, done a fair amount of homework, and then posted critical remarks. The reaction to each of you was, well, standard Wavoid gang-attack. I realize none of you are emotionally invested in the argument enough to waste any more time on it. Heck, I agree that you're better off moving on to other matters.
Pardon me for bein a persistent pain in the ass, but I've been having this argument for going on five years now. The boys at the WAVE board want a controlled discussion. The leader, Snackman, is relentless in repressing opposing views. He deletes all sorts of stuff that, under the IHUB TOU, ought not to be deleted. He has run off CPA and Bluefang, both of which are respected long-time longs, for being critical of management. And Matt, for whatever reason, lets him get away with it. Hey, I can see I'm buttin my head against a brick wall here, but I'd as soon get booted out of this place than put up with the monumental hypocrisy that there is any balance whatsoever in the way the place is moderated.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
