InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Elmer Phud

01/23/04 12:01 PM

#24140 RE: sgolds #24139

Sgolds -

Was RDRAM manufacturable?

Sure.

How about the huge-die Itanium?

What about it?

Soon we will see about Prescott - the rumors are in full agreement that it is difficult to manufacture.

Ahhhh the "rumors"! I'd like to comment here but can't.


icon url

chipguy

01/23/04 12:42 PM

#24146 RE: sgolds #24139

Intel could easily design the highest performance product in the world if they didn't care if it was manufacturable or could produce a profit.

Is that so? Was RDRAM manufacturable? How about the huge-die Itanium? Soon we will see about Prescott - the rumors are in full agreement that it is difficult to manufacture.


LOL, how many RDRAM was Intel planning to manufacture?

The Madison I2 very likely has less critical chip area (i.e.
not protected by redundancy) than a Northwood P4. FWIW,
I talked to ex-Alpha designers after they moved to Intel.
They couldn't believe how high the yield Intel was getting
on the 421 mm2 McKinley even in preproduction.

Prescott not manufacturable? I bet in several months that
repeating that statement will get you laughed off even the
AMD board. ;-)

icon url

Mysef

01/23/04 1:05 PM

#24150 RE: sgolds #24139

sgolds,
re:Intel could easily design the highest performance product in the world if they didn't care if it was manufacturable or could produce a profit.

I think Intel just admitted AMD has the highest performing CPU in the world.

Less elaborate is more difficult? The P4EE sums up Intel's difficulties and stands in contrast to this position.

I bet Semiconeng and his team at Chandler could crank out Athlon64s in quantities that AMD only dreams about.

Mysef
icon url

Tenchu

01/23/04 5:53 PM

#24173 RE: sgolds #24139

Sgolds, Soon we will see about Prescott - the rumors are in full agreement that it is difficult to manufacture.

LOL!

Tenchu