InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

rbtree

08/07/07 11:26 AM

#1654 RE: Rocky05 #1653

You really don't know much about Skull Valley, do ya?
I don't know what you're on about....the material in the various pits is what's left over from processing the ore. It is called tailings. I've never read anywhere about unprocessed ore sitting around. Are you referring to the rest of the acreage that wasn't dug up?

Spieleman and Bender, the original miners, garnered a miniscule amount of Au from the placer mine. They recovered Au at the rate of about .005 opt, which is way way below profitable levels. Doubtful that they missed enough to make reprocessing worthwhile.

You really need to read the SEC doc, and the links to the old complaint. Here's the full doc: http://www.sec.gov/litigation/complaints/comp18016.htm Any and all claims of value made by the company have been fraudulent.
icon url

rbtree

08/07/07 7:26 PM

#1655 RE: Rocky05 #1653

Rocky, thanks for the pm's, but as a freeloader, I can't reply.

I went to the company website and viewed their presentation from their spring meeting. I see they call some of the material ore and some tailings. Regardless, whether it was processed 20 years ago or just stockpiled, it is still mostly dirt with little or no value, as has been proven by the only valid assays ever done, which were by Act Labs and Bondar-Clegg. None of the company commissioned assays are any good. If they were, surely the evidence would have been presented at the SEC case and trial.