So I don't understand your confusion.
I said that $2,000,000 was not a fixed amount and you apparently agree.
I said that the shares issued will only pay a fraction of the debt, not all of it as you originally stated.
They virtually eliminated the debt of the parent...
(In other words all the debt.)
Apparently you now agree with me on that as well.
Why did it take you so long and use up so much wind to explain yourself?
I also noticed that you avoided defending your statement that all of the assets were being released.
Dutchess, whose Notes payable included a lien on all of DNAPrint's assets agreed as part of this deal to release their claim on the assets.
Care to elaborate on that one?
(Please don't write another encycopaedia, just answer the question.)
regards,
frog
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
