InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

cfpjbs

07/27/07 3:26 PM

#65686 RE: MARAV #65683

Thanks MARAV, I am sure I won't be the only one calling Christine next week, but if no one else posts their conversation I will post mine. I still have a list of questions needing answers, but I am also aware of the legal implications of giving out inside information, here in the USA as well as Canada.

I think I99 was the 1st to post about Christine Legace, and I am totally confident everything he said was true. If he posts any conversation it will be very easy to confirm, so I want to acknowledge his effort.
icon url

bonesmccoy

07/27/07 3:34 PM

#65688 RE: MARAV #65683

If they are reading this board and the negative comments of detractors, the company could be wanting to be very careful with the language. Therefore, it would be logical to run the press release past attorneys who are versed in SEC rules and the various issues.

Since they are planning a meeting and since they need to have clarity in the PR, they will need to have it reviewed by the legal department (especially if the PR agents want to keep getting contracts from other companies).

icon url

abbam

07/27/07 4:16 PM

#65696 RE: MARAV #65683

good thinking. My thoughts also. They could have a much better offer and need to backout.