Matt, Ben Chertoff, the man who put that article together is the cousin of Homeland Security Secretary, Michael Chertoff. Now please explain to me why he claimed that he didn't know his cousin. Why would he do that when in fact, he knew he was his cousin? Wouldn't you think that he would be proud that his cousin was the head of Homeland Security? I'll tell you the reason he denied it. It was very uncomfortable for him for people to know because he knew that the Popular Mechanics' article was a sham. You wouldn't know that though, because you'd much rather type away.
I gave you this video privately (not just on the board), and you have chosen to ignore what you see and hear. You are the type of person that our government absolutely adores. You will back them up no matter what is so very obvious.
Then why do the people from Popular Mechanics refuse to go on the radio and debate some members from the 9/11 truth movement? What are they afraid of?
Nationally syndicated progressive talk show host Thom Hartmann, (Air America), has issued a challenge to those researching 9/11. http://www.911blogger.com/node/9431
Essay Debunking the Debunkers 2/14/05: "For over a decade now, the PTB [Powers That Be] have used an odd vehicle to do their debunking on a variety of issues - Popular Mechanics Magazine (a Hearst publication). I suppose they are targeting the back-yard mechanic and auto-enthusiast crowd, who are often prone to accepting conspiracy facts and theories.
In the March 2005 issue, PM magazine singled out 16 issues or claims of the 9/11 skeptics that point to government collusion and systematically attempted to debunk each one. Of the 16, most missed the mark and almost half were straw men arguments - either ridiculous arguments that few conspiracists believed or restatements of the arguments that were highly distorted so as to make them look weaker than they really were. ...
I am one of those who claim there are factual arguments pointing to conspiracy, and that truth is not served by taking cheap shots at those who see gaping flaws in the government story ...
There is significant evidence that the aircraft impacts did not cause the collapse [of the Twin Towers] ...
The issues of the penetration hole [at the Pentagon] and the lack of large pieces of debris simply do not jive with the official story, but they are explainable if you include the parking lot video evidence that shows a huge white explosion at impact. This cannot happen with an aircraft laden only with fuel. It can only happen in the presence of high explosives." http://www.rense.com
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
