InvestorsHub Logo

$CHUD$

07/07/07 9:38 PM

#53979 RE: EFGoVols #53977

Ir needs to get real. All they had to do as a company is fix the problem on pinksheets when it was first addressed in the town hall instead of ignoring it. They also cant possibly believe that a post on a investor board about a secratary doing her nails would hurt their stock.

Ir needs to do their job and quit complaining that people are being people.

veloyt

07/07/07 9:40 PM

#53981 RE: EFGoVols #53977

GoVols
"stunt someone in your group pulled" that tells me that there are characters and/or groups that could care less about building the company but they are more interested in making it difficult to grow a new company. I wonder how much the company had to pay for stupid stunts made by armchair business CEO's who think they are on top of their game but I have a rough time understanding how they think they know how to run a startup company more so than our CEO's

KA12

07/07/07 9:41 PM

#53982 RE: EFGoVols #53977

How absolutely sad and horrible. Nothing like the few ruining it for everyone. I hope that they are able to recover from this lost opportunity.

Toni

07/07/07 9:43 PM

#53985 RE: EFGoVols #53977

honestly, this has been my biggest concern. That Esprit would look on us as "hostile investors" when most of us are in full support of the Company.

$CHUD$

07/07/07 9:49 PM

#53987 RE: EFGoVols #53977

It was great of the co to post an update on their town hall about the pipnksheets mishap. Very professional responce.

Stratey

07/07/07 10:02 PM

#53993 RE: EFGoVols #53977

I'll put my hand on a sack of bibles. I DID NOT call pinksheets on this issue.

Also, I had nothing to do with the secretary issue. I think we all know who caused that problem.


Besides, the company caused the pinksheets issue themselves. Why are they blaming the IHUB board?? That's completely unfair in my opinion. I'm in agreement with $CHUD$. They made this bed, unfortunately...not us.

trepid

07/08/07 4:17 AM

#54058 RE: EFGoVols #53977

Sorry to say but this is a very immature response in my opinion.

I don't see how the secretary comment caused problems beyond extra time on the phone and sending some emails. Maybe they think people won't invest because of a joke on a message board.

Regarding the "pinksheet stunt" that was "pulled". That wasn't caused by anyone posting here. It was instead caused by some issue between the company and The Pinksheets. The company knew, or should have known, about the problem long ago. Many people emailed them about it, myself included. My own email was sent back on June 9th.

Instead of IR taking responsibility they choose to blame their shareholders. Very sad that we have to go through this in light of the promising future this company has.

This reminds me of IR blaming the person who researched the various websites connected to the company a few months ago. If I remember correctly, they blamed him/her for the share price not moving up on some good news.