Mingwan0,
You've had a busy day.
Doesn't it seem as though DNAP already has reached conclusions these studies have as their goals?
Have you ever talked to Mark shriver to see what it was that piqued his interest in and moved him to collaborate with Dr Frudakis and DNAP.
Of course none of these grantees have a commercial interest, other than royalties from patents, and Shriver apparently wanted to become part of a commercial venture.
It just seems to me that DNAP, with the patents applied for covering what Frudakis and evidently Shriver too, consider the most important Ancestry Informative Markers in the genome, holds a remarkable position.