InvestorsHub Logo

parentsgratae

07/06/07 11:19 PM

#2770 RE: rocketeer357 #2768

rocketeer....I drew this conclusion from Mr. Hartman's WallSt.net interview in which the precise vols of hydrogen were stated and my engineer spouse, did the conversion into available energy and the amts from such a primitive reactor were staggering in our view. We calculated that a small swimming pool the size we have would empower 30 homes. Also, the bioreactor is designed for R&D and much has been learned as was stated in a prior PR. All of this information and the conversion website was in prior posts that I wrote after the Hartman interview if you care to research. The essential fact is that using microbes results in cheap hydrogen and is the only known method in which greater energy is released than is required to produce the hydrogen [other methods have been mentioned here but none yet commercially producing with a prototype]

parentsgratae

07/06/07 11:36 PM

#2771 RE: rocketeer357 #2768

The particular difficulty Welch has [which has been accomodated by the bioreactor] is the scheduled cleaning producing a high PH when the facilities are washed down; Erie, of course, is not a food manufacturing plant, and would not have that limitation. A vast difference between a waste-water treatment plant and Welch.

CONSIDER: if NNLX develops a way to process city slug and produce hydrogen at the same time, the potential of NNLX is great, beyond what we know at this time;