InvestorsHub Logo

needdiamonds

06/24/07 4:52 AM

#6830 RE: Mighty_Mezz #6827

receivership is too break up the company and pay off creditors. The shareholders will get nothing. How is this a better option?

needdiamonds

06/24/07 4:57 AM

#6831 RE: Mighty_Mezz #6827

Before you ask for or agree to a receivership, you better know what one is. here is a link for ya. Shareholders will suffer and die if this takes place imo. Read this and tell me this is good for shareholders?

What is a Receivership?
A receivership comes about when a company defaults on its secured borrowings. These borrowings are usually from a bank or another lending institution that has in place a security for their loan. To organize the finance the lender took (what is known as) a floating charge as a security over the assets of the company to secure the loan in the form of a debenture. When the lender suspects that the company is insolvent or is about to become insolvent (that is, it cannot pay its bills when they become due) to protect itself it appoints a person known as a receiver (thereby putting the company into receivership).

The receiver’s role is to take over the running of the company with the sole purpose of doing everything possible to repay the outstanding loans. The receiver’s job is to get together all the assets and discharge or pay off the floating charge first, that is on the lenders loan, and then pay off any preferential creditors. A receiver will take control of the administration of the company and when the lenders loans have been fully repaid the receiver will hand the company

http://www.startrungrow.com/information/business/1,6589,receivership.htm

needdiamonds

06/24/07 12:34 PM

#6835 RE: Mighty_Mezz #6827

The receivership is so the SEC can get their 21 million dollars and shareholders get nothing