Lucy, I wasn't calling a bottom at .02
I was predicting a sustained "trading range" of .02 to .03 at a time when the stock had been trading in the mid 03's and the happy-talkers were trying hard to get the train back on the tracks.
How many of those who you say predicted a bottom at .02 also stated that the stock was going to hang in that range for weeks?
Name a couple?
There sometimes appears to be a wide gap between what I say, and what I am quoted as having said, which is why I now post URL's pointing to my earlier posts.
And because memory on this board appears to be somewhat selective, it is why I now also post URL's to earlier posts of others who may suffer from this problem.
Works for me!