InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

qazwsx

06/14/07 12:52 AM

#28109 RE: azguy35 #28106

well I am not defending those capital letter one line post - I am talking about slamming those who offer objective analysis based on the facts- no BS pumping or bashing.

and in that spirit-do you or do you not agree that the argument that someone is buying has been used from when the stock was 5 cents. why hasnt that argument held so far in terms of supporting the price, the stock could be trading at 0.01 cents and at that point somebody will be buying too so whats the big deal.
icon url

sippinpurp

06/14/07 4:21 AM

#28122 RE: azguy35 #28106

Substance? The Doc failed to show for an interview HE pr'd! This interview was supposed to clear up the confusion regarding nakeds and SIAM. HE BLEW IT OFF AFTER HE PR'D IT!!!!!

Just look at him. He's a frickin weasel!