InvestorsHub Logo

NUFSED

06/12/07 8:42 PM

#328 RE: LGL8054 #327

Response to LGL posting 327

1. My source and I are happy to talk with you outside of a message board and I am e-mailing you accordingly. (see also my response to metrolane posting #326)

2. I’ve said what I think and I’ll keep saying what I think, provided it’s appropriate for a message board and in alignment with all applicable securities laws. If my source and I differ on an opinion, I’ll separate the differences and folks can draw their own conclusions over time.

3. As a large shareholder (who has continued accumulating over the last couple years and who is still now continuing to accumulate as my budgeting and financing allows) I’m very happy with the company’s leaders (who’s shares are locked up for years!), and also the many other large shareholders in our group bringing large things to the table.

4. Since I’m obviously getting more information than you, it’s easy for me to feel very comfortable with how the company’s securities attorney and the board are handling things properly, including the tiny private placement that covers things until merger/acquisition announcements and/or the last Waylinks assembly line production part that was re-tooled allowing the company to run the production line 24/7, at speeds you may later learn to be better than one antenna per minute.

5. Naturally, in terms of key players I’m also familiar with many or the various newsletter writers, content providers, and many entities bringing large brokerage firms, ISP’s, phone and cable companies and other things (and/or merger/acquisition situations) not yet announced formally and I operate within the strictest SEC guidelines in a conservative way.

6. Regarding leadership – we especially like how Jerry, et. al., have brought

A) Lots of merger/acquisition to the table.

B) Hundreds of entities interested in using the intelligent antenna.

C) Getting Bill Tomberlin on board was better than bringing Shaq to a basketball team.

D) We like how the company’s a steal at around 7 time’s sales.

E) We like how they’ve increased profit margins substantially.

F) We like how in 2006 Jerry cut expenses by about 83% while increasing sales by over 30%,
PRIOR to converting to the new technology.

G) They can write tariffs and pull phone numbers.

H) Other points for future postings.

7. Regarding ongoing merger/acquisition activity – I and my source concur that with respect to these first few profitable companies in confidential negotiations (and/or completion of contracts from agreed upon deal points) whether we’re talking about cable companies, ISP’s or other – we should refrain from discussing details of these merger/acquisition activities until all sides release their announcements/filings, etc.

8. The following information you asked for (in your posting) is easily found throughout the public domain. The transfer agent did the right thing in referring you to call the company. The transfer agent was legally required to handle it as he did.

9. CCOP shares outstanding is 52,197,050 of which the public float is around 4.8 million. Closely held shares are 15,966,532, most of which is locked up for many years. Much of these shares (300-500,000 thousand dollars are liquid in theory) are held by small (5—20K) 144 stockowners. Many of which are holding and/or accumulating more stock until price points exceed $5-$10. The simple math of taking the first few deals, multiply times earnings and/or revenues, convert price per share, and were in position to talk about prices well over $10 per share, using appropriate formulas.