Replies to post #269002 on Sulja Bros. Building Supplies, Ltd (SLJB)

[alien42]

what would make the AFs 'very good'?

2x4s, trimming and nails from a small town operation do not qualify as 'very good'. tons of concrete to the middle east, now that is a different and entirely fictitious story.

[boogaloo]

red, Good, as in nearly $16 MILLION net after-tax profit? And that was a YEAR ago. Remember that PR and those unaudited financials? Let's discuss this. What do you say? Care to risk your posting rights in a friendly wager about whether the audit will be ANYWHERE near that level? I'll even give you 30% error in your favor (that's pretty flexible).

[EarnestDD]

I think the AFs will be disappointing.
They certainly will not be as good as what PV initially had.

If there were ME deals, I think the AFs will take longer to perform by Turner Stone.

imo

[janniebgood]

So, Redskies, you have no concerns about the apparent fact that the audit period encompasses only the period from April 06 through May 07, and omits the period during which the company touted a net profit of nearly $16 million, which gave many incentive to buy its stock? That certainly was one of my incentives, and now it appears they are reluctant to prove those numbers by not auditing that period. Failure to do so will also inhibit the company's ability to uplist. Their reasons for not presenting an audit of that period should be transparent to anyone with a brain. And I'm quite sure the OSC won't be happy about it either.