Replies to post #43200 on Intel Corp (INTC)

[alan81]

No, no, no...
not the source for the number of fabs, but the source for the reason WHY they need that fourth fab. It could be they plan to move chipsets to 45nm rather than keeping them on 65 or 90nm for all we know. Actually, we do know that with Nehalem both the MC and the GPU move onto the CPU, which changes things quite a lot.
--Alan

[Elmer Phud]

Klaus

You implied that manufacturability issues caused Intel to add a 4th 45nm fab. Intel has never made any such statement.

Obviously you made it up.