InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

DewDiligence

05/24/07 6:03 PM

#3807 RE: mact3333 #3806

>what if the person held the bat upside down and he still hit .335 with 40 homeruns???...:)<

Then he would absolutely, positively be on steroids!
icon url

poorgradstudent

05/24/07 6:06 PM

#3808 RE: mact3333 #3806

>what if the person held the bat upside down and he still hit .335 with 40 homeruns???...:)<

lol

true, but i think that for some, the DNDN data were looking like the clinical trial equivalent of brady anderson... they hit .297 with 50 homers one year (9901) but then .288 with 18 homers the next (9902A)

;-)
icon url

poorgradstudent

05/24/07 6:07 PM

#3809 RE: mact3333 #3806

>what if the person held the bat upside down and he still hit .335 with 40 homeruns???...:)<

lol

true, but i think that for some, the DNDN data were looking like the clinical trial equivalent of brady anderson... they hit .297 with 50 homers one year (9901) but then .288 with 18 homers the next (9902A)

;-)

(for historical purposes, brady's subsequent season followed 9902A... he never got back to 9901 form)
icon url

bobrmd

05/24/07 6:15 PM

#3811 RE: mact3333 #3806

I knew there was something i liked about u.