>what if the person held the bat upside down and he still hit .335 with 40 homeruns???...:)<
lol
true, but i think that for some, the DNDN data were looking like the clinical trial equivalent of brady anderson... they hit .297 with 50 homers one year (9901) but then .288 with 18 homers the next (9902A)
>what if the person held the bat upside down and he still hit .335 with 40 homeruns???...:)<
lol
true, but i think that for some, the DNDN data were looking like the clinical trial equivalent of brady anderson... they hit .297 with 50 homers one year (9901) but then .288 with 18 homers the next (9902A)
;-)
(for historical purposes, brady's subsequent season followed 9902A... he never got back to 9901 form)