InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

stsamlouis

05/18/07 12:47 AM

#14363 RE: DownWithPumpers #14362

Great post!!!
icon url

PinkZombie

05/18/07 12:52 AM

#14366 RE: DownWithPumpers #14362

Maybe you cannot read. He said "he would not answer my specific questions on projected revenue because it had not yet been revealed in a public statement, he did say that there would be a shareholder letter in about two weeks (which means next week) where a lot of the investor's questions will be answered."

Sounds like he took the ethical road to me. What is it that I am missing DWP?
icon url

iblong2

05/18/07 1:03 AM

#14371 RE: DownWithPumpers #14362

Not a red flag for me. Only a basher would try to turn what he said as a red flag. If you think it is a red flag, get lost!!

Mr. Martin was very careful in his comments and did not provide any "important company information". Also he never said that the sp was going up, only that the sp would reflect the true value of the company. For a basher like you, that would mean a lower sp (or you would not be here bashing the stock).


icon url

Fishing at Surfside

05/18/07 1:21 AM

#14379 RE: DownWithPumpers #14362

Niceo of you to pop in. Why do you disappear when you are asked questions? Give it up, pal.
icon url

LCLiving

05/18/07 9:08 AM

#14440 RE: DownWithPumpers #14362

Red flag??? LOLOL. Reading comprehension is a wonderful thing and it is never too late to learn. Let me break it down for you.

will be very pleased with the direction that the company is heading LOI's to be explained, production numbers, future plans-

that he believes the share price will soon reflect the true value of the company. He obviously doesn't think the sp reflects the true value. That is not a pump statement, it is his belief and one that most who have done their DD would agree with. You are just trying to twist his words to fit your agenda which would be what?? Want to buy cheaper or are you or a friend caught short here?????