InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Artguy

05/17/07 1:07 AM

#11601 RE: observer10 #11598

My point was that some investors were glad to hold this stock when all the company had were some ideas and a computer rendering of the IVT. They liked it even more when that idea was working in a Dodge Ram. Torvec has come a long way since then. Not long enough for some.

Why is it taking so long? Government, non-disclosure, production intentions/capabilities, national security. When you have connections and possible interest from the US military on one hand and the Communist Chinese on the other, you might have some issues to deal with. If you made a CV joint that really does work better than anything out there, I'd think you would want something approaching the value of the less capable part you are replacing.

Doesn't it strike anyone as ironic that given the wide ranging and serious interest in Torvec technology, some investors seem to want to dismiss the inventions because it's not happening NOW?

If you can find another stock that will have new machines that they invented and patented, on the moon as well as quite possibly in the world's fastest sportscar, Army trucks and even a future car you might own, I'd say buy it and hold it, but that's just me.

This is just my view. I'm a former critic who is now pretty excited about the next Torvec event. I thought the FTV cruising by a Jeep that blew a tire and almost an engine trying to get out of the mud, was pretty cool, but Koenigsegg and the Moon are far better.

I have no idea what the state of negotiations are with any company. Maybe it would help to remember that things change. Companies merge to make a supercompany and 9 years later the bigger part gives away the lesser part (Chrysler-Benz).

Sorry about the sentence structure. Most people seem to get it. It's really only on this board where I've ever run into someone who had a problem with my text. One guy really went off on 'sentence structure'. That was pretty funny. For a second I was back in Jr. High. I think his real issue was what I was saying, not how I said it. The other guy was in the same vein, but he had some kind of built in 200 words or less problem. Apparently it was super aggravating to read my big paragraphs. Not a speed reader I guess.
icon url

newspeedwayboogie2

05/18/07 9:20 AM

#11619 RE: observer10 #11598

you sound like sheriff with all the chinese babel, I hope the chinese are not in play I don't like the idea of doing a deal with them. I like them more as leverage in a deal with someone else. The patents have only been finished for a few months and from what I here there are some improvments on the way. I think people should sack up or get out.