Replies to post #44614 on BigHub.com Inc (fka BHUB)

[immitt]

When might he be proven wrong?

[REKNAWXAM]

Why not make a "Meaningful" bet? In other words when it is beyond the DP 60-90day deal threshold, and resolution is no where in sight, what will you do as your side of this bet?

[ynotme]

That's a pretty lame bet - I suppose you will be the judge of what 'wrong on the stock' actually means'? Sounds a lot like the cheerleaders who used to be here with guarantees of a MOASS, no chance of a halt, and other such nonsense.

Here's a bet for you - I bet you that Peterson will not get the Bighub website up (the one his tech guys were building to keep investors informed) within the 10 day time span he promised.

[serfdom]

TODAY:
Techlabs, Inc. (OTC Pink Sheets: TELA.PK) today announced today that its Board of Directors has declared a ten-for-one forward stock split of its issued and outstanding common stock.

April 13, 2007
"Techlabs, Inc. plans to forward split its shares one hundred to one and to tender for all unregistered shares issued to investors of BHUB on a one for one basis."

Can you explain this Curber? Does this mean that BHUB shareholders won't get the shares they need to trade again?

[serfdom]

"Further you will agree to learn about reading SEC reports and rules and regs before typing another thing on this board. Are you on?"

IMO, the filings detailing the involvement of NITE in the TELA-BHUB deal, in connection with backdated claims of ownership to old 10Qs, were the most confusing, re-engineered filings I're read in quite some time. That's why I asked for your help. I think you'll find that's all I ever did.

Why so nervous? And how come you never explained? And why hasn't BHUB stood up and proven its ownership of the shell yet? So far, many experts have been unable to locate any evidence that says they hold control vs. the current OS.