Replies to post #22649 on Alcar Chemicals Group, Inc. (fka ALCX)

[MrBigz]

From The ACMG FAQ's page:

My team and I are dedicating our lives to this project and are succeeding to remain on track. We have been criticised, and perhaps justifiably so, that news was lacking.

Do I believe that our stock will significantly increase and allow serious dividends to be issued over the next four years? There is not the shadow of a doubt in my mind – why else would I have injected everything I owned into this endeavour. However, common sense states that this cannot happen overnight so please – all the get rich quick dreamers out there, quit wasting our time with ignorant questions fuelled by your own frivolous expectations…and for those asking what our PPS is going to be tomorrow, get your own crystal ball.

[pinkeyepete]

Petresa vs PCI chem.

PCI doesn't offer international exposure, and Petresa is owned in majority by the largest petrochem company in Spain with operating plants on 4 contenents. Only Petresa could be connected to Siam.

Location of plant discription said about 1/4 mile off hwy30. PCI is several kilometers off hwy30, and Petresa's driveway is only about 1/4 mile off.

PCI is a public traded company and the LOI would have required a PR if they were part of Siam.

PCI would have also been required to PR a sublease of property if it involved any income generation, or asset alocation (property) to Alcar.

When you read the discription of who/what Siam investors are, you'll find it matches up well with Petresa's owners, and doesn't apply to PCI at all.

I submit my opinion that only Petresa could fit the site location discription, and have ties to Siam.