Replies to post #266043 on Sulja Bros. Building Supplies, Ltd (SLJB)

[marketmann]

I've seen that case number. it has NOTHING to do with
sulja as the pr stated.
hell, YOU even posted a copy of the page with petars name on it. nowhere was sulja mentioned.

[binzur]

Not management but the company claimed to have a judgement yet the company isn't a party to any suit! What case number are you referring to so all can verify that the COMPANY is actually a plaintiff in that or any suit.
Thanks
Binzur

[bowlingo]

I called. there is no monetary judgement issued whatsoever. There is judgement only where failing to file a response is relative. Also, the person involved, the named defendant, has no involvement with Sulja whatsoever. I doubt this person even knows who Sulja is..and Sulja is not a plaintiff.
That is all I am saying
I am going on record, and asking you to stop spreading these fasle comments.

[marketmann]

Even though Petar is an advisor for Sulja, the lawsuit does not state that the plaintiff (Petar) is suing on behalf of Sulja. Therefore, I would consider it a personal suit (PV vs. KJ). The intensions may have been that PV was suing on behalf of Sulja, but that's not what it says in black and white.

If he's an advisor for another company at the same time, does that mean the lawsuit will also benefit that company? Do you see what I mean?

The PR should have said something like, PV, one of Sulja's key advisors, was recently successful in a lawsuit against a non-supporter of the company...

I'm sure the longs will want to beach slap me for this post, but the facts are the facts.

what do YOU think about stockhogs post? i'll take a no reply as a sign you AGREE with his post.

[marketmann]

are you 100% sure sulja has a judgement?

Even though Petar is an advisor for Sulja, the lawsuit does not state that the plaintiff (Petar) is suing on behalf of Sulja. Therefore, I would consider it a personal suit (PV vs. KJ). The intensions may have been that PV was suing on behalf of Sulja, but that's not what it says in black and white.

If he's an advisor for another company at the same time, does that mean the lawsuit will also benefit that company? Do you see what I mean?

The PR should have said something like, PV, one of Sulja's key advisors, was recently successful in a lawsuit against a non-supporter of the company...

I'm sure the longs will want to beach slap me for this post, but the facts are the facts.

we both know you wont oppose this statement. makes one wonder why not?

[marketmann]

since that post wasn't 100% truthful.
how about you explain how you're going to get rid of the CEO?
do you really think you have enough shares on the treehouse to vote anything?
how many of those .002's have you sold so far?
it's the weekend, why dont you post some positive FACTS?
got any?