InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

allezlOM

05/10/07 10:00 AM

#77720 RE: Art2Gecko #77711

Art: interesting list, but more interesting is that it looks no one of it have give their answers/responses to the Court..any reason ? ...eom
icon url

500_and_Long

05/10/07 10:50 AM

#77747 RE: Art2Gecko #77711

hmmmmmm 695)KUWAIT MIDDLE EAST FINANCIAL INVESTMENT COMPANY KSC
icon url

sniperflea

05/10/07 11:03 AM

#77755 RE: Art2Gecko #77711

They certainly sound interesting. I dont think OK District Court can touch them though. If he was serious and the charges had any weight he would of went through federal court IMO. This is a cheap intimidation ploy going through a LOCAL district court. Jurisdiction is still not clear but very relevant. All IMO of course.
icon url

janice shell

05/10/07 6:00 PM

#77878 RE: Art2Gecko #77711

And how can one sue:

1263) NON-MARKETABLE SECURITIES BOUGHT FROM CUSTOMERS

or

1271) WORTHLESS SECURITIES ACCT

...and so on? What a sloppy job Megas and his attorneys did.

Have you asked Megas why so many people who didn't get a summons did get the dismissal notice and the "offer" to surrender their shares? Why's Sytner on that second list?