Replies to post #10521 on DNAprint Genomics (DNAG)

[frogdreaming]

People, Catch a clue.

Mingwan hasn't gone anywhere. Anyone who thinks that he can be cowed by a post from me, has either grossly over estimated my influence or severely underestimated him. One has only to review our few previous discussions to discover that neither option is viable.

I am sure he will be back. I interpret his post to suggest that it is not his presence that will be curtailed but his attempts to circumvent his non-disclosure agreements via oblique references.

As to his claim;

"There has been no attempt to improperly influence investor opinion on anybody's part."

I beg to differ.

Anyone who has read the series of posts from 'stockpimpdaddy' that contains the referenced information, knows that the entire sequence was a blatant attempt to influence shareholder opinion in the midst of the Kondragunta/eyecolor0 dabacle.

For those that missed it, Kondragunta/eyecolor0 began posting on the RB forum the day after his association with DNAP was terminated, he was obviously upset and he divulged inflamatory information regarding the state of affairs at DNAP. Within a few hours/days of his appearance, a counter point was delivered in a series of posts from stockpimpdaddy. These posts were an obvious attempt at spin control. They were the work of someone intimately involved with the inner workings of the company, and after the claims of Kondragunta were addressed and his credibility had been denigrated via personal attacks, the poster mounted a brief but passionate defense of the company in general and the CSO in particular. He closed the last post with his regrets that for reasons he could not divulge he could no longer continue to participate in the forum.

So whether the attempt at investor influence was justified,(in light of the blindside attack from Kondragunta), or not, the attempted influence is obvious. Since it came from a source either 'inside' the company or from an outsider with an intimate knowledge of events, it is improper by definition.

These being the facts, a rereading of my post will show that it was not accusatory but was, in fact, an offering of advice to a valued member of this forum in an attempt to protect his own interests. If there is anything to fear in this exchange, it is not me, but in becoming associated with such antics.



best regards,
frog