Replies to post #13146 on SPOOZ Inc (SPZI)

[mithrandir]

I don't know a lot about shareholder meetings in the US, but i think it must be at least possible to get some sort of resumé of the meeting. I've been a shareholder of SYTE (Sitestar) for many years now, and I always received a transcript of all their CC's / shareholders chat's. I just needed to ask. They mailed it without a problem.

So, if Spooz holds a meeting, and there won't be a recording, at least somebody will take notes, don't you think ??? But why don't they allow camera's ??? They're not that ugly, are they ? Isn't the purpose of this meeting to INFORM shareholders ? All shareholders ??? Makes me wonder hmm ...

Just some thoughts, no doubts ...
mith :)

[Imperial Whazoo]

My read on it is that it would somehow undermine things if "leaks" were the byproduct of the meeting on the 17th. It is logical, in my opinion. I'm not exactly sure of the exact chain of logic, but if I stand on the sidlines and consider the forest rather than the trees, I think I have to agree with the decision to block recordings and transmissions of any kind. And, I'm generally in favor of self-restraint because I've been patient for some time now.... why do anything that undermine the maximization potential of my share's price in the coming weeks? IMHO, it is in my interest to have the environment maxed out in terms of whatever conditions will generate the greatest growth in share price when the upcoming formal announcements are made. Thus, if, as I think the case may be, it serves our interests, I think attendees should voluntarily agree to comply with the company's party line and avoid being the source of leaks. Thats my stance, anyway. In that I'm looking for share price to continue to become stronger in terms of the current levels being suppport, I do very much hope that I'm reading this correctly (which I think I am) and, if so, that others will comply. My opinion is: voluntary restraint... NO LEAKS.

GLTA

Imperial Whazoo