Whatever LOL....the amts of a sustained hydrogen production have been verified and published in an article written by Dr. Diz who presented the results at the National Hydrogen Convention in San Antonio and the abstract of his findings have been posted here. That is excellent verification and is more recent than the article.
I give right to you. (at least with this one: " Logical? I think the term you're looking for is "wishful"") Right now we should see the facts. There are good and bad ones:
"Good": - Bret has become CEO (I think he's a large stockholder, but I do not really know if that is true) - We have sold some Hydrogen Conversion Engines (even though we don't know how many) - Our patents brought us some money (no given numbers, take perhaps a glimpse down) - We have 31 patents registered - We have a market cap from about $7-12 Mio - We are probably not beeing overtaken by an investing group
"Bad": After making some further research I found out these two interesting things - Our patents brought us till end of 2006 at max. $20'000 - We have some kind of a concurrence, take a look here: http://www.chiefengineer.org/content/content_display.cfm/seqnumber_content/2883.htm - We don't know who's selling but there are people who sell - We "loose" money while they are doing it - No news since a while - Many promises,(at least till now) none (as I remember) fulfilled - It's a pink sheet stock
So everyone who sees these "facts" should get to his own conclusion. When you believe it is good, so hold (or buy). When you believe it's bad, so sell or keep off.
Feel free to give further facts to my post - but facts, not opinions.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
