You're right ITGUY
I agree that when supported by facts, contrary opinions have an important function and are are a part of a healthy discussion. I wholeheartedly look forward to genuine arguments from other perspectives.
However, to me simply stating that the PPS is down and stating like it's fact that the PPs will continue to go down is not what I would call factual contrary opinion that has been based on any kind of DD. It only casts an unfair pall on the company and its stock and that is the part I object to. Imo, it is equally not healthy for the stock If you let a poster repeatedly fill a popular "investment discussion board" with unfair onesided information. if they really feel compelled to post unsupported malarkie, they should do that in another "chatroom" not on an investment discussion thread, imo.
I do see and agree with your recommendation and will take your advice. In a way though if you think about it, my confronting this posters agenda and questioning his motives is part of the very argument you are making, It should cause the poster to come back and post the basis for his opinion as there may be some merit to it, that is if there is anything he has beyond the well known and worn out dilution line. In other words my questioning him is as valuable to the process as you say his contrary opinion is. I am only trying to get him to state how he arrived at his conclusions. So far, the only reason he has given is so that he can get the price down further before he buys and I don't think that is a valid reason to state "the pps is going down next week" (several times) Before his first post I had not seen any discussions on this board of "some people" like he said that are stating the pps is going to .001, and that is my point with him, to come on and categorically state and imply that people are talking about the stock going to .001 and will be .001 next week like it is a fact when it is not.
For now I will drop it and let it go.
Thanks again ITGUY for your post.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
